A boy, age 8, trapped and burned to death on the third floor of an residential building. Along with this one death, five other children bwtween the age of 1-10 were seriously injured. At the start of the fire, 20 people were home. It over two hours and more than 130 firefighters to put down the fire. This event is just one of the too commonly heard tragadies caused by accidental fires. Not only is responce to these accidents too slow, but not enough is being done to prevent these accidents from even happening in the first place. I personally feel that these accidents could be avoided with more precaution or resources. Whats the point of having so much advanced technology if we don't put it to use.
When i read this article, i was also thinking" does it really take 130 firefighters to put out one fire?" Im pretty sure there are more efficient options.
I know its easier said then done, but what are some possible options that may help prevention? Or, what are the obstacles that are keeping us from responding in a timely/organized manner?
1 comment:
Here is the link to the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/nyregion/30fire.html
In my opion, I have to disagree with some of the things you had to say. First of all I believe that the fire systems are organized, to the point where they were able to get 130 fire fighters out.
You also mentioned that while you were reading the article you couldn't help but ask yourself if "it really take(s) 130 firefighters to put out one fire?"
i think your question should be rephrased to: "130 firefighters and still a little boy died?"
Post a Comment