This can be quite similar to 1964 with the 89th congress when the Democrats gained a majority in both houses. In the two years it was in session, it and LBJ managed to pass a whole lot of legislation, like the Voting rights act and Medicare. However, in the 1966 midterm elections, public backlash to LBJ's Great Society helped the Republicans gain 47 seats in the House. This shows that productivity doesn't always mean success in the elections, sound familiar? I can't say that I know that 111th's legislation can be considered successful and important legislation, since time hasn't told anyone yet, but the story sounds kind of familiar, doesn't it?
I doubt we will see that the next congress will be just as productive, but we can never rule out the possibility (yes we can actually, but always look on the bright side of life, right?). Hopefully, we can manage some bipartisan stuff down the road. So what do you think?
-a G.U. from the Spiral King
1 comment:
I guess the old adage, "History will always repeats itself" will be tested in next few years,eh Alex? I found it very interesting that this "lame-duck" session of Congress would be so proactive in passing so much legislation. I thought the repeal of DADT was done for with the Republicans' victory during November but I guess the Democrats are a lot craftier then I thought they were!
Post a Comment