Saturday, November 22, 2008

Better safe than sorry

As planning for the inauguration of Barack Obama continues at full speed, many security measure have been taken into account. Washington is bracing for the largest crowds in inaugural history, an estimated FOUR MILLION people will watch President-elect Barack Obama be sworn in to office.

Despite the fact that there has never been an assassination attempt at a persidental inauguration, threats against Obama have been higher than any other president-elect in American history so some precautions are being take. They range from thousands of video cameras, sharpshooters, air patrols, searches by machines and security personnel, undercover officers, and bomb sniffing dogs to countersnipers who are trained to hit a target the size of a teacup saucer from 1,000 yards away.

So for those who are going on the Washington trip watch out for suspicious activity and remember...you can run but you can't hide.

Obama's Communications Team

Downsizing...? Downsizing?

The stock market's crash and the shakiness of the economy continues to affect working Americans. Companies are still trying to cut down on spending by laying off employees left and right. Although this seems like a necessary move on the business's part, it definitely causes concern for most Americans. Citizens throughout the country are losing their jobs, losing their homes, and are worrying about what tomorrow will bring and how their bills will ge paid. It is very depressing to see America in this state and the country needs to take action right now. Since people have lost their jobs, spending has gone down and it seems like a never ending downward cycle...Hopefully Obama's economic plan (which we blogged about earlier) will be just what this country needs.

If you want information on which companies are downsizing (in the words of Dwight Schrute) go to the following site!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27840008/

Obama's economic plan

In what could have been a speech by FDR, president-elect Barack Obama promoted his economic plan today. His plan will supposedly create 2.5 million jobs by rebuilding roads and bridges and modernizing schools while developing alternative energy sources and more efficient cars. Obama explains that it will take support from Democrats and Republicans to pass the economic plan, Obama said. "I'll be welcome to ideas and suggestions from both sides of the aisle," he said. "But what is not negotiable is the need for immediate action." This is huge proactive change from the current administration, which has done almost nothing to try to create jobs and make effective changes. Will the plan work? I guess we will just have to wait and see.

Friday, November 21, 2008

It's down, it's down, no wait it's up?

Wall Streets incredible volatility continued today with the Dow rising 494 points. Why? It didn't rise because of better unemployment numbers, better economic indicators, an improvement in the housing market, or even a change in the value of the dollar. So what was it? Obama announced today that he will nominate New York Federal Bank President Timothy Geithner as his new Treasury secretary. It was this announcement that seemed to prompt the rally. Investor confidence has lessened to the point that any glimmer of hope seems to bring about short term gain. This just goes to show how little confidence people really have in our current administration. Even this small hint of intelligent change brought about positive result on Wall Street. When investigators wake up on Monday and realize that the Bush administration hasn't changed, who knows what’s going to happen. I wish I could be more optimistic.

For more info:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/21/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm?postversion=2008112118

Thursday, November 20, 2008

...and you would think they would be smarter, wouldn't you?

Genius political one-liners can have the power to stick with voters throughout a politician's campaign. They can create an image of a politician that represents them forever...but this may not be such a good thing for some..It is incredible that despite all that a politician does and sacrifices for the country, their entire career can be destroyed by a single one-liner...but do they deserve it? That's for you to decide!

The following is a collection of the top ten unfortunate political one-liners of America's history:
"I am not a crook." -Richard Nixon, 1973
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman." -Bill Clinton, 1998
"Read my lips: no new taxes." -George H.W. Bush, 1988
"The fundamentals of the economy are strong." -John McCain 2008
"I've looked on a lot of women with lust. I've committed adultery in my heart many times." -Jimmy Carter, 1976
"It's vile. It's more sad than anything else, to see someone with such potential throw it all down the drain because of a sexual addiction."- Mark Foley, 1998
"We still seek no wider war."- Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964
"That depends on what the meaning of 'is' is." -Bill Clinton, 1998
"The fundamental business of the country, that is, production and distribution of commodities, is on a sound and prosperous basis." -Herbert Hoover, 1929
"You know, I always wondered about that taping equipment but I'm damn glad we have it, aren't you?" -Richard Nixon, 1973

Depressing News

With all of the talk regarding the bailout, the newly elected president, and other economic issues, it’s easy to ignore the long term global destabilization that is likely to bring about increased terrorism and even increase the chance of nuclear weapons being used. I think the fact that Europe and Asia followed in the US economy’s downturn, reinforces how interconnected the world has become. The “smaller” world we inhabit really increases the scariness of existential threats brought about by rouge states with high tech weapons. US intelligence sources revealed today, that nuclear warfare is becoming increasingly likely in the future. The world seems headed down a path that will include more nuclear weapons by rogue states, population increases in the poorest parts of the world, climate shifts brought about by global warming, and terrible food shortages. (Just the highlights from a long list of depressing future possibilities.) Maybe, the nightly news isn’t so depressing after all.


Nuclear weapons use more likely in future: US intelligence

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The use of nuclear weapons will grow increasingly likely by 2025, US intelligence predicted Thursday in a report on global trends that forecasts a tense, unstable world shadowed by war.
"The world of the near future will be subject to an increased likelihood of conflict over scarce resources, including food and water, and will be haunted by the persistence of rogue states and terrorist groups with greater access to nuclear weapons," said the report.
"Widening gaps in birth rates and wealth-to-poverty ratios, and the uneven impact of climate change, could further exacerbate tensions," it concludes.
Called "Global Trends 2025 - a Transformed World," the 121-page report was produced by the National Intelligence Council, a body of analysts from across the US intelligence community.
It has good news for some countries. Among its conclusions:
-- A technology to replace oil may be underway or in place by 2025;
-- Multiple financial centers will serve as "shock absorbers" of the world financial system;
-- Global power will be multipolar with the rise of India and China, and the Korean peninsula will be unified in some form.
But the report also says some African and South Asian states may wither away altogether, organized crime could take over at least one state in central Europe; and the spread of nuclear weapons will heighten the risk they will be used.
"The likelihood that nuclear weapons will be used will increase with expanded access to technology and a widening range of options for limited strikes," it said.
The report highlighted the risk of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East where a number of countries are thinking about developing or acquiring technologies that would be useful to make nuclear weapons.
"Over the next 15-20 years, reactions to the decisions Iran makes about its nuclear program could cause a number of regional states to intensify these efforts and consider actively pursuing nuclear weapons," the report said.
"This will add a new and more dangerous dimension to what is likely to be increasing competition for influence within the region," it said.
The report said it was not certain that the kind of deterrent relationships that existed for most of the Cold War would emerge in a nuclear armed Middle East.
Instead, the possession of nuclear weapons may be perceived as "making it safe" to engage in low intensity conflicts, terrorism or even larger conventional attacks, the report said.
"Each such incident between nuclear-armed states, however, would hold the potential for nuclear escalation," it said.
The spread of nuclear capabilities will raise questions about the ability of weak states to safeguard them, it said.
"If the number of nuclear-capable states increases, so will the number of countries potentially willing to provide nuclear assistance to other countries or to terrorists," it said.
"The potential for theft or diversion of nuclear weapons, materials, and technology -- and the potential for unauthorized nuclear use -- also would rise," it said.
The report said terrorism would likely be a factor in 2025 but suggested that Al-Qaeda's "terrorist wave" might be breaking up.
"Al-Qaeda's weaknesses -- unachievable strategic objectives, inability to attract broad-based support, and self-destructive actions -- might cause it to decay sooner than many people think," it said.
"Because history suggests that the global Islamic terrorist movement will outlast Al-Qaeda as a group, strategic counterterrorism efforts will need to focus on how and why a successor terrorist group might evolve during the remaining years of the 'Islamic terrorist wave.'"
The report was vague about the outcome of current conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and nuclear armed Pakistan.
In 2025, the government in Baghdad could still be "an object of competition" among various factions seeking foreign aid or pride of place.
Afghanistan "may still evince significant patterns of tribal competition and conflict."
"The future of Pakistan is a wildcard in considering the trajectory of neighboring Afghanistan," it said.
(http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081120/pl_afp/usintelligenceforecastnuclear;_ylt=AmK2SdXCiSatOVZt9f0wrp6s0NUE)

Change or simply more of the same?


Obama campaigned on the slogan of "change we can believe in" but as he continues to form his cabinet, he is appointing many people in high positions who are definitely not new to Washington. Although it is favorable that the people appointed have experience, many are angered by the lack of "change" in Obama's cabinet. Many want to see new faces in Washington instead of the recycling the same leaders. However, if Obama were to have chosen completely new politicians to advise him during his presidency, I believe that American's would also be angered because some think that Obama himself isn't experienced and at times would need Washington insiders to lead the way. Also, it seems as though Obama has been using Clinton's cabinet as a model for his own. Many perceive Clinton's cabinet in a good light (despite his affair...) because of what they were able to accomplish as a team. It may be beneficial that Obama rely on Clinton's cabinet as an example so that completely new and inexperienced people are not appointed to the highest positions in the government. Although many would like to see new faces in government it is vital that these positions are filled by people who are accustomed to Washington and American government.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

More on the bailout





Here are some political cartoons regarding the much debated bailout.

What are they thinking?

What would people say if a homeless man drove up to a soup kitchen in a limousine claiming that he was starving and asking for food? Similarly, the major auto company leaders showed up in Washington DC today in corporate jets, begging for a 25 million dollar bailout. It is ironic that the same men who are claiming that they are going to modify their business models to make them more effective, are still living so lavishly. Ultimately, I do not know if the auto bailout should happen or not, but what I do know is that selling their corporate jets would be a good start both in lowering auto industry costs and showing a commitment to not doing “business as usual”.



(CNN) -- Some lawmakers lashed out at the CEOs of the Big Three auto companies Wednesday for flying private jets to Washington to request taxpayer bailout money.
Chrysler CEO Robert Nardelli, left, and Ford CEO Alan Mulally testify on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
"There is a delicious irony in seeing private luxury jets flying into Washington, D.C., and people coming off of them with tin cups in their hand, saying that they're going to be trimming down and streamlining their businesses," Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-New York, told the chief executive officers of Ford, Chrysler and General Motors at a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee.
"It's almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in high hat and tuxedo. It kind of makes you a little bit suspicious."
He added, "couldn't you all have downgraded to first class or jet-pooled or something to get here? It would have at least sent a message that you do get it."
The executives -- Alan Mulally of Ford, Robert Nardelli of Chrysler and Richard Wagoner of GM -- were seeking support for a $25 billion loan package. Later Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reversed plans to hold a test vote on the measure.
An aide told CNN that Reid decided to cancel the test vote when it became clear the measure would fall well short of the 60 votes needed. Reid did, however, make a procedural move that could allow a vote on a compromise, which several senators from auto-producing states were feverishly trying to craft.
At Wednesday's hearing, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-California, pressed the private-jet issue, asking the three CEOs to "raise their hand if they flew here commercial."
"Let the record show, no hands went up," Sherman said. "Second, I'm going to ask you to raise your hand if you are planning to sell your jet in place now and fly back commercial. Let the record show, no hands went up."
The executives did not specifically respond to those remarks. In their testimony, they said they are streamlining business operations in general. Watch Nardelli ask for help »
When contacted by CNN, the three auto companies defended the CEOs' travel as standard procedure.
Like many other major corporations, all three have policies requiring their CEOs to travel in private jets for safety reasons.
"Making a big to-do about this when issues vital to the jobs of millions of Americans are being discussed in Washington is diverting attention away from a critical debate that will determine the future health of the auto industry and the American economy," GM spokesman Tom Wilkinson said in a statement.
Chrysler spokeswoman Lori McTavish said in a statement, "while always being mindful of company costs, all business travel requires the highest standard of safety for all employees."
Ford spokeswoman Kelli Felker pointed to the company's travel policy and did not provide a statement elaborating.

But those statements did little to mollify the critics.
"If it is simply the company's money at stake, then only the shareholders can be upset or feel as it might be excessive," said Thomas Schatz, president of the watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste.
But in this case, he said, "it's outrageous."
"They're coming to Washington to beg the taxpayers to help them. It's unseemly to be running around on a $20,000 flight versus a $500 round trip," Schatz added.
The companies did not disclose how much the flights cost.
Analysts contacted by CNN noted that the prices vary with the size of the plane and the crew, and whether the aircraft is leased or owned by the company.

Al-Qaida Scares Me...

Today, a video of Ayman al-Zawahiri, a member of Al-Qaida, has appeared on the internet. This video is the group's first response to Obama's victory and employs racist comments and slurs against. him. The video aims at attacking his policies, race, and religion. For example, he refers to Obama as a "house slave" who serves his white masters.

The video also includes a picture of Obama wearing a kippah (Jewish skullcap) while praying at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. Al-Zawahiri then makes the comment that Obama has betrayed his Muslim father and of creating ties with Jewish organizations to further his political ambitions. He continues and states, "You have reached the position of president, and a heavy legacy of failure and crimes awaits you". He later says that Obama must "Be aware that the dogs of Afghanistan have found the flesh of your soldiers to be delicious, so send thousands after thousands to them" and that despite claims Obama is not a force of change.

Wow. He must be living in a cave with Osama Bin Laden.

Although it may seem that foreign groups may be more accepting of America once an African American is president, obviously this will not be the case. Hatred toward America continues to grow despite a shift in power. This will be a major struggle that the Obama administration will have to face and try to overcome in the future.

you should not go to the following site or watch the following video if you are sensitive...

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=6291091

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

more information: continuation of the previous prop 8 blog!

I just came across this article, which relates to the previous post I made...so if you're interested and want more info go here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/us/18marriage.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

To bail or not to bail? That is the question.

Unfortunately this is very scary! Losing three of the biggest employers in the United states would be an unimaginable blow to the economy. However, trying to keep three businesses in business that are operating with business models that keep them from being able to be competitive and turn a profit seems like we would be throwing our money away. What to do? I'm not sure, but I am sure that there isn't a ground swell for automaker reform coming from either Bush or Congess. If congress decides to go for a bailout, which I ultimately hope they do, it can't happen without huge reform. Perhaps Warren Buffett has a yen to be the next Henry Ford. Somehow the automakers are going to have to find a way to make desirable small fuel efficient cars profitable. It is hard to picture anything else as the future of the automobile industry. Can labor costs controlled by big powerful unions really be reduced to make them competitive with the international market? Will executives take dramatically reduced salaries? Will the automakers be able to refocus and make a more desirable product while increasing efficiency and reclaiming the role of technology leaders? With the very shaky future of oil will car makers rise to the challenge and create new technology that ultimately frees the US from foreign oil dependency and makes the creators of the new technology and their companies long term profitable? While I have no idea if any of these things are really possible I remain hopeful. The idea of losing a entire industry is to bleak to fathom.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081118/ap_on_go_co/congress_autos;_ylt=ArmsqrYOlJCXi0_AiT09oHeMwfIE

Senator Stevens bites the dust

Reason rules out, and a convicted senator has been booted out of office. Stevens has served six terms in the senate, the longest serving senator in the history of Alaska. He will be replaced by Mark Begich, a democrat. Interestingly Begich ran on a platform that not only differed from his opponent, but greatly differed from former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. Begich 's platform included promises to return Alaska to an education policy that respects community values, work across party lines to implement a new Alaska energy plan that works for Alaska families and communities, and to safely and responsibly redeploy our troops out of Iraq. Personally, I think he is the real maverick from Alaska.

WASHINGTON— Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens has lost his bid for a seventh term. The longest-serving Republican in the history of the Senate trailed Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich by 3,724 votes after Tuesday's count. That's an insurmountable lead with only about 2,500 overseas ballots left to be counted.

Stevens, who turned 85 Tuesday, also revealed that he will not ask President George W. Bush to give him a pardon for his seven felony convictions.

Stevens had already been removed as top Republican on the Commerce panel and his ranking position on the powerful subcommittee responsible for the defense budget.

(http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-11-18-stevens-gop_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip)

What's your news IQ?

Where do Aragon gov students fit into the national average?

Take the quiz at http://pewresearch.org/newsiq/quiz/

Anger over the outcome of Prop 8 anyone?


































There may be hope!



Protests againts prop 8 are being held across the state by supporters of same-sex marriages, and frankly they're making a splash. Currently, the California Supreme Court is reviewing the propostion to decide if the passage of eight is constitutional or if it should be overturned. In 2000, proposition 22 was passed with 61% of the votes in order to prevent California from recognizing same-sex marriages. Although voters did pass the propostion, in May 2008 the California Supreme Court struck down the initiative, thus giving same-sex couples the right to marry. So, although proposition eight has been passed by 52% of voters, it is a possibility that the court will overturn the decision and give the same rights to gay couple as straight couples. The only issue is....how long could that take?


If you would like to read an article covering the specifics or the protests..here it is! http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/16protest.html?pagewanted=1&ref=politics
I found this article extremely interesting and I take pride in the fact that American's have taken it upon themselves to create change and bring light to an important issue.

Anger over the outcome of Prop 8 anyone?

Monday, November 17, 2008

for your entertainment :)

Will Obama really emulate Lincoln?

Obama often references Lincoln as his political hero. After the civil war, faced with calls to exact painful reparations on the south, Lincoln refused and tried when possible to include former enemies in the newly re-united nation. Speculation has abounded that Obama will include republicans in his new cabinet. Just yesterday he met at length with his former competitor John McCain to discuss how they can work together to help solve the nations problems. Building bridges before he even assumes power is definitely not something I've seen in my lifetime.

Here is some of the speculation out there from the horses mouth regarding republicans he might appoint to cabinet posts. (Obama's answer to a question about republicans he would work with at a town hall event in Manchester N.H.):

1. Dick Lugar who is a moderate republican that Obama says he liked working with in the senate. (He has been consistently mentioned as a candidate for Secretary of state.)

2. Sen. Chuck Hagel who is a moderate republican and Vietnam war veteran.

3. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger who as the republican gov. of California has been a worldwide leader on global warming and environmental issues.

Since his election he has repeated his promise to have at least one republican in his cabinet. Abraham Lincoln? I'm not sure, but to borrow his campaign catch phrase, appointing a republican really will be change.

View the following links for more info:

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/obama-pledges-to-appoint-republican-to-cabinet/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdGYHC3XNj8

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/12/obama-says-hed.html

Obama and McCain: working together?

Recently, President Elect Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain met to discuss issues America is facing and how they may work together to solve these problems. Obviously, Obama is making an effort to reach bipartisan solutions.

It is important that politicans set an example for American citizens when it comes to being open to working with people that may not share the same ideals/beliefs. Often it is easy for us to reject the ideas of members of the opposite political party, but this is only holding our nation back from reaching its fullest potential. Politicians must work together to solve this nation's problems because the issues we face today do not face only Democrats or only Republicans but every single American. Although it may be more difficult to work with someone that is not exactly like you, it is important that politicians go through the struggle in order for the govermment and its policies to represent and meet the needs of as many citizens as possible. Also, by working together Obama and McCain are unifying Americans and demonstrating that to succeed everyone must be eager and willing to work together and reach solutions.

During the election/campaign process, hatred between the opposing parties has been more evident than ever. McCain and Obama's attempts to work together have displayed that American's must put their differences aside for the good of the country.

If you would like to know the specifics when it comes to what was discussed during the talks visit....http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122694399164234073.html

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Farewell to Illinois

Today, Obama resigns his post as junior senator of the State of Illinois. His farewell letter is published in Illinois newspapers and marks an important milestone in the transition to presidency. Here it is in its entirety:

Today, I am ending one journey to begin another. After serving the people of Illinois in the United States Senate -- one of the highest honors and privileges of my life -- I am stepping down as senator to prepare for the responsibilities I will assume as our nation's next president. But I will never forget, and will forever be grateful, to the men and women of this great state who made my life in public service possible.

More than two decades ago, I arrived in Illinois as a young man eager to do my part in building a better America. On the South Side of Chicago, I worked with families who had lost jobs and lost hope when the local steel plant closed. It wasn't easy, but we slowly rebuilt those neighborhoods one block at a time, and in the process I received the best education I ever had. It's an education that led me to organize a voter registration project in Chicago, stand up for the rights of Illinois families as an attorney and eventually run for the Illinois state Senate.

It was in Springfield, in the heartland of America, where I saw all that is America converge -- farmers and teachers, businessmen and laborers, all of them with a story to tell, all of them seeking a seat at the table, all of them clamoring to be heard. It was there that I learned to disagree without being disagreeable; to seek compromise while holding fast to those principles that can never be compromised, and to always assume the best in people instead of the worst. Later, when I made the decision to run for the United States Senate, the core decency and generosity of the American people is exactly what I saw as I traveled across our great state -- from Chicago to Cairo; from Decatur to Quincy.

I still remember the young woman in East St. Louis who had the grades, the drive and the will but not the money to go to college. I remember the young men and women I met at VFW halls across the state who serve our nation bravely in Iraq and Afghanistan. And I will never forget the workers in Galesburg who faced the closing of a plant they had given their lives to, who wondered how they would provide health care to their sick children with no job and little savings.

Stories like these are why I came to Illinois all those years ago, and they will stay with me when I go to the White House in January. The challenges we face as a nation are now more numerous and difficult than when I first arrived in Chicago, but I have no doubt that we can meet them. For throughout my years in Illinois, I have heard hope as often as I have heard heartache. Where I have seen struggle, I have seen great strength. And in a state as broad and diverse in background and belief as any in our nation, I have found a spirit of unity and purpose that can steer us through the most troubled waters.

It was long ago that another son of Illinois left for Washington. A greater man who spoke to a nation far more divided, Abraham Lincoln, said of his home, "To this place, and the kindness of these people, I owe everything." Today, I feel the same, and like Lincoln, I ask for your support, your prayers, and for us to "confidently hope that all will yet be well." With your help, along with the service and sacrifice of Americans across the nation who are hungry for change and ready to bring it about, I have faith that all will in fact be well. And it is with that faith, and the high hopes I have for the enduring power of the American idea, that I offer the people of my beloved home a very affectionate thanks. 

Saturday, November 15, 2008

The Obama promises.




On NPR this morning, I heard that the Obama website, change.gov, has deleted the promises page completely. The entire platform is gone. Could it be that it is infeasible for him to make good on some of his promises? we will see.

On Affirmative Action

As many of you may know, Barak Obama graduated Harvard Law School Magna Cum Lauda. As a child living on food stamps in his early ages, he showed great promise.Because of the poor area he grew up in, and his family circumstances, there would have been no way he could have gone to Harvard without affirmative action (albeit he did attend a prep school). But this is not a bashing of Obama nor affirmattive action, merely a comment on the past. It worked, he is now president. Furthermore, it should be eradicated now because it has come full circle, a man who 50 years ago would have been segregated now has great power, he is the quintential maverick.
Now that we know it worked, the program should be disabled. Although they are exceptions, some minorities hide behind affirmative action. It is a fact that an African-American in a poor area has a much better chance of going to an Ivy-League University with financial aide and scholorships than a white person in an affluent suburb, even thought the latter probabaly went to a better school.
This is my opinion, what do you think? I have yet to hear any compelling arguements for affirmative action that do not have something to do with segregation, newsflash: the students benefiting from the program never experienced it.

Fireside Chats 2.0


"President-elect Obama plans to to publish these weekly updates through the Transition and then from the White House."
It seems that President-elect Obama is going to bring FDR's fireside chats to the modern age by going to be the first President to deliver their weekly address by video. From his first video address, it is quite clear that he plans to do something about the current economic crisis when he is inaugurated. One of his points is, "It means investing $150 billion to build an American green energy economy that will create five million new jobs, while freeing our nation from the tyranny of foreign oil, and saving our planet for our children." seems like an ambitious plan, perhaps too ambitious....
Regardless of his plans for the future, his decision to make his weekly address more accesible to everybody deserves merit. +1 Obama

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Keith Olbermann on Prop. 8

Powerful stuff.

Election Simulation Articulation (Open Thread)

This is going to be an open thread for you to comment on the upcoming election (Woot! It's tomorrow for Corti's class at least). Feel free to promote the party you support and bash the ones you don't (just kidding).  Even if you have already voted, your comment is nevertheless important.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Racial profiling? Since when?



The East Palo Alto police department recently has been inundated with burglary and breaking and entering reports. The vast majority of witnesses say that they saw black males leaving the properties. The police chief of East Palo Alto, following her logic, instructed her police officers to look for suspicious middle-aged black males and ask who they were. This incited an uproar, and there have been multiple marches and protests about the "racial profiling" that the police department is engaged in. This is not racial profiling, it is merely looking for a suspect based on eyewitness reports and the descriptions of the perpetrators thereof.
If the police department was arresting minorities because they thought that such people may have committed a crime, but had no evidence to support this, then that is racial profiling, but looking for suspects based on criteria which is based on eyewitness descriptions is good police work. It would not make sense to question Hispanic females rather than black males when all reports point to black males committing the crimes.
However, recently, the East Palo Alto police chief went to a black church to apologize for the misunderstanding, but they shunned her, and refused to hear her point of view, and dismissed her as a racist. The lieutenant, a black woman, argued for the chief, and said that what she was instructing her officers to do was in no part racist.
The debate ensues, and is drawing the attention of the NAACP, ACLU and other minority rights organizations, outraged at the racism that the police department is allegedly proliferating.
In my opinion, this is ridiculous. Nothing is wrong with searching for suspects based on eyewitness reports, and this whole fiasco should never have happened.

(by the way, the article linked to in the title is an argument that it is racial profiling)

What ever happened to priorities?




After this summer's war between Georgia and Russia, threats to the United States from Russia over the missile defense shield, and two casualty intense wars that have no end in sight, all the news networks can cover is the scandal over whether the Obama family will cave to the public and buy a dog from the pound. This seems a little ridiculous. after all of the domestic problems in America, be it home forecloses, poverty, the recent spike in burglaries, and the manic-deprissiveness of the NYSE, all the media (and most of America for that matter) cares about are frivolous issues of non-import.
Something has got to give. The media has truly overstepped its madate this time; they should be covering to housing crisis, or how Iran's president supported Obama until he realized that Obama doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons either. Seriously, can anyone say they acutally care about what kind of dog the Obama family will have over serious international and domestic crises?

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Yay! It's Veterans Day

Ninety years ago, World War I ended with the Germans signing the Armistice on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month. Today, we celebrate and honor the services of those who served in our country's military. It is interesting to know that another name for World War I was the War to End All Wars, but it has evidently failed to do so. Nonetheless, today remains the day to pay our respects to veterans, in both wartime and peacetime. Whether or not you agree with United State's current involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is important to recognize the sacrifices that soldiers give to their country. 

Anyhoo, enjoy your holiday and may God bless America. 

Here is George C. Scott's rendition of Patton's famous speech to the members of the Third Army. 

Caution: Strong Language


Monday, November 10, 2008

The war on terror has gone way too far.

In a recent article by the Guardian, cross-border attacks from Iraq and Afghanistan are apparently the tip of the iceberg of illegal raids into foreign nations in order to perform strikes on Al-Qaida. The article details raids into at least six nations other than the ones that the United States is occupying, including Ethiopia, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, Oman, Syria and reconnaissance missions into Iran. This is unacceptable. America has overstepped its mandate on combating terrorism around the world. America must stop, or we will face dire consequences with both the world community and the UN.
However, it is important that we save face in the world community by finding Bin Laden and finishing the Iraq war, both of which President Obama plans to do. This may prove risky, as the war is unpopular and many people have forgotten the war in Afghanistan. I think that all troops need to be sent home today, period. But practically, this is impossible.

Obama is already sitting down with an unpopular, aggressive world leader without preconditions!

For many, this sight would have been impossible to imagine. George W. Bush, the 43th president of the United States, walking side by side with the future president of the United States, Barack Obama. Today, the Obamas toured the sacred halls of the White House, a place they would be living in for the next four years. President Bush talked with President-elect Obama about the change of power that is going to occur when Obama is inauguarated to be President and leads the country in a new direction. Ironically, both Obama and Bush wore nearly identical suits. Judging from their appearances, I would have naively assumed that they might be similar. However, it seems that the only thing the two have in common in the picture is their clothing. Obama promises to be a complete change from the Bush Adminstration  and repair the nation back to its glory. In constrast, the lame duck president is looking to ride out the rest of his troubled presidency.

Today, for the first time in his life, Barack Obama saw the Oval Office in person. In ten weeks, he will not only take the oath to be the highest political office in the United States, but also be the first black American to do so. Along with the White House, Obama is given a mandate to command and a democratic Congress. However, whether or not Obama will preside wisely and carefully have yet to be seen. Like they say in Spiderman the movie:
"With great power comes great responsibility." 
I hope President Obama will heel these words.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Obama Making Good on Campaign Promises

As I'm sure many of you recall, President Obama made many promises to the American public through out his campaign. One of his many promises was that he would go through "the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work". He has also promised to fix "the failed promises of George W. Bush". It looks as if Obama is already making good on this promise. Obama and his advisors have already begun the process of reveiwing all of Bush's executive orders. Reports have said that Obama's transition team has already identified a number of issues where Obama can issue executive orders once Obama assumes the office of president.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

International Congrats

I have a lot of friends and family abroad and the day after Obama was announced the President-elect I got several emails from them commenting on our new president. My Norwegian friend said "maybe the whole world won't hate you anymore!" and she tells me often the dislike her country has for Bush which by the way she describes it rivals ours. So I just thought it was interesting to do a search for news articles concerning our election in other countries, like this one by the Prime Minister of Norway. If you go to Google news you can pick which country you want news articles from although not all of them offer English settings. There are some funny articles from Google España for anyone speaking Spanish...

Edit: For anyone who gets the San Francisco Chronicle look at the front and back cover of the front section today (sunday). It is exactly what I was looking for when I made this post last night, it shows a ton of front pages from newspapers around the world. The Chronicle publishes most of their articles free online as well but I couldn't find this particular one.
Here is another interesting link though concerning Obama and the President of Russia.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/09/MNG514152T.DTL

Obama's Winning Demograhics!

How exactly did Obama secure victory for the Democratic party? Who do we get to thank for this amazing acomplishment? Well for starters, no surprise but Obama won the low income vote. Surprisingly, Obama also did well with the wealthiest of Americans. According to exit polls Obama won 52% among voters who earn $200,000 and more. Obama also won the Catholic vote, something that John Kerry was unable to do when he ran for President, despite the fact that Kerry is Catholic, while Obama is a Protestant. Obama won 66% of the youth vote. Among suburban areas in Florida, Ohio, Virginia, and Indiana, Obama managed to win counties that had gone to Bush in the 2004 election. So Obama secured a pretty impressive victory! He managed to win the votes of some groups that have historically recently gone republican. So congrats to President-Elect Obama!

Friday, November 7, 2008

As the Election dies down, the economy troubles return.

"People all over the world are celebrating Obama’s victory. Sarah Palin watched the Russians celebrating from her house. ---Craig Ferguson

I saw this quote and it reminded me, suddenly of the economy, but it's kind of confusing why it reminded me of it. Here we are, all pumped for the outcome of this election, but I've forgoten about the current ecomonic crisis, not only here in the US, but also overseas (like in Russia, that's why the quote reminded me about this subject in the first place).

On a more serious note, Obama has much to think about regarding the economy. Obama held his first press conference as president-elect, stressing that the focus of his efforts would be the struggling middle class.

"We need a rescue plan for the middle class that invests in immediate efforts to create jobs and provides relief to families that are watching their paychecks shrink and their life savings disappear," Obama stated.

I think that the choices he makes first will reflect stopping the economic disaster that is hanging in the balance. I searched for an article of any sort regarding Obama and his ideas to "rescue the middle class" with jobs and such, but all I found was that statement. Obama might be too busy preping for the White House, but in my opinion he should lay out his ideas to get us out of this mess.

CBS news this morning said that although the economy dropped a few weeks ago, here in California we are only just being hit with it. For some, it won't be too bad, but for others, it means losing jobs and homes. Nonetheless, this is an important issue and I think Obama would be making a smart choice by making it his top prioity when entering the White House.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Prop Hat8? No, just 8

A fair number of students asked me this week what will happen next in regards to gay marriage in California now that Prop 8 is part of the Constitution.

Here are several excellent sources on this:

Eugene Volokh on what will likely happen, legally speaking
Matthew Yglesias on the "backlash"
And of course Andrew Sullivan has a bazillion posts on this subject, which is fitting, since he -- FAR more than Gavin "Whether You Like It Or Not" Newsom -- really helped make gay marriage a reality over the past 15 years.

As mentioned in class, I don't see there being a legal remedy besides putting it back on the ballot and convincing more people on the merits. Maybe this will be ruled to be such a significant change that it requires a 2/3 vote, as there are 2 mechanisms for changing the California Constitution, and that would invalidate prop 8 (and enrage its fervent supporters.) But I doubt it. The best way to get gay marriage is to increase the respect in society for gay people, and frankly, I thought the no on 8 campaign completely failed in that respect. To earn more respect, we have to embrace the real fears that people have and talk them down. I find it telling that prop 8 passed by wide margins where few gay people live and was voted down by pretty wide margins where gay people are commonplace. Hmm. Familiarity breeds respect.

The Yes on 8 campaign capitalized on those fears, and their ad and direct mail campaign was pretty outrageous to me. "Hate is not a family value" remains the best bumper sticker of all time. Yet, while there is some irrational prejudice that borders on hate out there, calling all the Yes voters haters is not a winning strategy. Turning the other cheek and talking to people with respect? Much more difficult, but much more effective.

So tomorrow, some number of people, including myself, will be wearing black as a symbolic protest. I hope that no one gets overly confrontational about it on either side. Asking someone to articulate their reasoning is not offensive. Being outraged about holding a position that approximately half the State holds could be, and, moreover, it doesn't change anyone's mind.

I must admit that it was more than a little disheartening to be left out of what was a moment of national pride and reconciliation. Obama's victory was a very nice moment for the country that I celebrated heartily. Many Republicans who couldn't vote for Obama on policy grounds were similarly patriotic. Progress is good, even with a band of counties from Texas up through West Virginia that went against the otherwise across-the-board trend for Democrats which can't be explained away without involving race.

Still, it stung, more than I would have thought. As a teenager, as I realized that I was actually a disrespected minority, I became very interested in the struggle for racial justice. I loved my college coursework on the subject, and the civil rights movement was my favorite unit when I taught US history. I fear that had I not faced prejudice of my own that I might not have had much empathy or understanding for cultural identities beyond my own experience. So, far beyond the policy and politics of the moment, I cherished Obama's rhetorical calls for unity as well as his victory. And then, a few hours later, a major letdown, one that would not have happened had African-American turnout been especially high for this particular election. Had prop 8 been defeated by a narrow margin, it would have felt like a huge win, but really, we are talking about a different level of respect from 5% of the population, which is within sight, and I thank the many students who have expressed their solidarity over the past few days. There is little doubt that by the time your generation takes the reins of national power this issue will be about as settled as race seems to be here in 2008.

What would the world be like if...

I was emailed an extremely funny video of the possible futures for both candidates, depending on who won. It's quite funny, but could some of it be a little more truth than parody? You can be the judge of that:

http://www.comedy.com/blog/2008/11/03/what-the-world-will-be-like-if-obama-wins-vs-what-will-happen-if-mccain-wins/

Obama chooses Emanuel as White House Chief of Staff

Today Obama announced Rahm Emanuel as his White House Chief of Staff. This is the first of many appointments our president-elect will have to make and allready there is controversy over his very first pick. Emanuel has a reputation for tough politics, a disregard for hurting feelings, and for relishing media attention. He once mailed a dead fish to a political foe. Emanuel has been a Democratic member of Congress since 2003. While some critics of Obama's choice claim he is too aggressive, others praise his agression as a perfect complement to Obama's general disposition. So, is this choice a shrew political move on the part of the president-elect, or is this something we should be concerned about?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

106 year old woman.




If you watched Obama's speech last night then you probably heard Obama mention Ann Nixon Cooper, a 106 year old woman who voted for Obama. Cooper was born a generation after the end of slavery. She lived to see women earn the right to vote, and the end of segregation. This is a woman who has lived through a lot!!! It was only fitting that Obama honor her with his speech, and with this call that you see in this video.

San Mateo County Info

I was interested to see the particular results of our county and this is the official site, its interesting to see what you can find. A list of all the precincts showed the percent outcome, the lowest one is about 42 percent and the most was 92 percent but mostly the averaged around 60 and 70 percent, so it's good to know lots of people vote in atleast our area.
And HERE:
http://www.shapethefuture.org/elections/results/november2008/resultsarchive.asp
It shows all the other results from past elections which is really cool to see the difference in turnout.

McCain's Concession Speech

Again, for anyone interested.

Obama Acceptance Speech

For anyone who didn't get to see this last night.

Why Obama won.

Obama, the winner of 349 electoral votes, including Virgina, Florida, and Ohio, was the estimated president as of last night at 8:01pm PST after the West Coast polls closed.

Both candidates had a tough campaign, and there were times when both looked like they could come out on top. McCain stated he would put his "Country First" something the citizens needed to hear, while Obama won support through by contrasting himself with the current office. In his victory speech, Obama thanked his organizational teams, campaign volunteers and all his supporters. But those people are not the only reason he won.

For starters, Obama focused on a core theme of change. Americans everywhere are struggling and he gained support by offering them hope. Obama constantly slammed McCain for being "just more of the same", when the country really needs different approachs.

Second, Obama made a great decision in not taking public funds, allowing him to expand past the maximum ammount set, and raise as much money as possible. The money helped get his ideas published, television adds, and more volunteers.

Thirdly, (something we didn't exactly touch on in class) was that Obama had a difficult fight in the primaries against Senator Clinton. Unlike McCain, Obama had to start the race, with "full arms a-blazing" and was on the defence and offense from the get go. I'm not sure how much this greatly effected the outcome last night, but it's still something to consider.

Any other opinions? Is there something I missed?

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

I don't mean to spam this blog but it's been difficult to find the results of the propsitions as they come in so here it is:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/state/#CA

Only prop 8 and prop 4 are at the very bottom. So far it's not looking too good.

And the winner is...

CBS just announced Senator Obama as the new president of the United States. 283 electoral votes to Senator John McCain's 145.

!!!!!!!!

I THINK OBAMA JUST WON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You call the election!!!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/calculator/

So this website is fun to play around with. It shows what states CNN has allready called and it allows you to play around with the other states and determine who will win in them. Basically it becomes clear that if you make the assumptions that Obama will win CA (not exactly a risky bet) and Hawaii, then Obama really only needs one other state that has more than 3 electoral votes in order to secure the neccessary 270 electoral votes. In order for McCain to win he would need to win every other state that has not been called by CNN (excepting CA and Hawaii which i continue to assume will go to Obama. So McCain needs 15 more states to win, while Obama only needs 3 more.

Ohio--the deal breaker?

Based on the current exit polls, Ohio has been taken by Obama.
No Republican candidate who has won the election has ever lost Ohio.
Is this bad news forshadowing for McCain?

Still, more states to come, it could still sway either way.

Does anyone else find this whole horserace thing a little absurd?

So I was just watcing chron 4 and they were saying that Obama has the lead in New Hampshire and McCain is leading in Kentucky. That all sounds fine and dandy and I'm sure there information is accurate. Then they proceed to say that they are basing this information off the 1% of precincts that are reporting in New Hampshire and the 2% of precincts reporting in Kentucky. Hold up!!!! 1 and 2%, well clearly that means that the race is won in those states, why bother counting the rest of the votes!!!! I'm sure that it is entirely possible, perhaps even likely that these results will be accurate, nevertheless, it seems absurd.

Election: 4pm Exit Polls



Now exit polls are not always accurate, but for now it's all we have.
So far, Obama has potentially secured Vermont, and McCain has gotten Kentucky. Indiana and Virgina are too close to call.
Indiana is 50% McCain, 49% Obama.
Virgina is 53% McCain, 46% Obama.
We are toying with the idea of updating every hour or so.
Any comments so far?

Monday, November 3, 2008

The Latest Polls


With elections literally hours away, most people have finally chosen their favored candidate. As the campaign continues in full swing for both parties, some people have claimed to still be undecided. About 4% (says the most recent Gallup poll) are still weighing the pros and cons of both candidates and probably won't decide until tomorrow in the polling booth. But as for now, the current standards leave Obama at 53% and McCain at 40% of the registered voters.


Gallup has predicted that Obama will win the general election in 2008, and they've only been wrong twice since they started polling in the late 1930s. Things look good for Obama, who currently holds the vote of about 83% of all non-white voters. McCain might have a slight lead in non-white votes (51%-44%), but Obama's lead is now more significant because of the increase in non-white registration this election.

Although the polls have been released, and Gallup has picked it's candidate, things are still up in the air--things could always change. We will only know for sure (hopefully) tomorrow night so in the mean time, get some sleep and remember to vote tomorrow (if you can). Have fun, poll workers. :)

The Death Penalty

My Special Interest Group is the Justice For All Criminal Justice Reform Organization and it made me wonder where the candidates this year stand on the subject and I thought it was interesting to see that their views didn't vary too much. In researching Interest Groups that are pro death penalty I had trouble because the overwhelming majority of the groups and websites out there are ANTI death Penalty, and the US is one of the only developed countries practicing the Death Penalty to the extent we do and we have received a lot of criticism for that. But it doesnt seem to fit with how many anti death penalty groups there seem to be out there.
This Articles in this Teen Magazine is very good and here are some links of what the candidates think about the death penalty.

Teen Inc:
http://www.teenink.com/Opinion/article/49841/Capital-Punishment-Is-Dead-Wrong/

Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcl-T0P7xYU

McCain:
McCain supports the death penalty for federal crimes. McCain says we should extend use of the death penalty and implement stricter penalties for violent felons. McCain supported legislation to prohibit the use of racial statistics in death penalty appeals and supports banning it for persons under eighteen.

( http://cfc.wciv.com/external.cfm?p=mccain )

Arizona, not Necessarily a Lock for McCain

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1856048,00.html?iid=tsmodule
According to this article, it is not necessarily a given that McCain will win his home state of Arizona. McCain served two terms in the House of Representatives for Arizona, before his four terms as Senator for Arizona. For a state that he has served so loyally for so long, to turn there back on him now is not an encouraging sign. The 20 point lead McCain held over the summer has now been reduced to only 3.5 points, a drastic change. This doesn't bode well for his success in the polls tomorrow. Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan all managed to secure the electoral votes from their home states, and not that he can't possibly win without Arizona, but this speaks volumes about how loyal his constituents are to him. So will Arizona go red or blue? Thoughts?

Some Serious Negative Campaining

The ads in this article just jumped out at me as being super negative, especially the second one though. I haven't seen a lot of ads from this election so I don't have that much to compare them to but it just seems so nasty. McCain's last ditch attempt to link Obama to the "Muslim" world. I see this as being rather general and maybe offensive to the muslims here in America? who might be then driven away from McCain... I remember this issue of linking him to the middle east because of his name coming up a lot around the time of the primaries and now they are bringing it up again, running old ads again.

Record Turnout Predicted

http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/nov/03/83-percent-voter-turnout-expected/

According to this article there is over 80 percent turnout expected tomorrow. I am signed up to help at the polls tomorrow and last night when I was talking to the supervisor of my precinct he said he's heard that 80 percent were expected to vote and I was shocked, because as we know from our wonderful AP gov class, normally the percent of people who CAN vote who DO, cirlces around 50 percent. But some polls are expecting up to 83 percent this election which is awesome. Could it be that these candidates apeal to a wider range of people? we know men are more likely to vote than women, but now we have a woman candidate, and also Clinton possibly got a lot more women involved at the primaries, and whites are more likely to vote than minorities, but here we have a black man running, so that could get minorities more involved.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

I'm Helping, Dontchaknow?

Sarah Palin has saved McCain's campaign, and McCain is ahead in the polls. McCain could win this election by a landslide. Oh wait, my apologizes, good people. What I meant to say was that Sarah Palin looks as if she has done more harm than good to the McCain Campaign.

Recent studies by a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Sunday indicated that Palin has steadily been growing less popular among voters and may be costing McCain the election. With such a close race, it makes one think about what might have happened if McCain had chosen someone else? Democrats rejoice at the news of this survey, while Republicans are disappointed at the results.

Who would have thought that a Governor from Alaska, with little to no experience or qualifications for the Vice-Presidency would have generated bad beat? That someone who cannot speak for herself publicly, people tell her what to say, confuses her, and then she doesn't know what is what anymore, would create such a fuss and would potentially cost McCain the election.

Palin's popularity rating may prove to be the cause of McCain's downward spiral, but this is just one survey. Perhaps more surveys will pop up, but as of now, it could only possibly be suggested that Palin dragged McCain down with her.

A Losing Race?

With only two days to go, polls are being taken and it would appear that McCain is going to lose. 4 years ago, Bush carried many swing states that may be difficult for McCain to achieve. Does McCain have what it takes?

For the past two weeks, McCain has been spending a lot of time in Pennsylvania trying to convince voters to vote for him. Although Pennsylvania is Democratic, and Bush lost Pennsylvania four years ago, McCain seems to believe that he has a good shot at taking Pennsylvania. Should McCain be worrying about Virginia instead?

It seems that Virginia has become a swing state in this election. Although Virginia has usually been a state won by Republicans, in recent years, Virginia is becoming an example of the "crumbling of the GOP coalition." Virginia may yet be a harder state for McCain to win.

These two states are important swing states along with many others. For McCain, seemingly a maverick in a losing battle, these states could cost him the elections. Does McCain have what it takes to win these swing states knowing that Bush barely won them? Even though Bush had lost by only 2.5% vote in Pennsylvania, should McCain have focused on swing states that he could have had a better chance at? Like Ohio?

The Final Stretch

What a campaign trail it has been. With only two days to go, the candidates are going all out. As of Sunday, both campaign made millions of calls, had people knocking on very door, and mailed letters to potential voters bringing the cost of the campaign to a record breaking 1 BILLION DOLLARS. It is estimated that it would cost each of them 8 dollars per Presidential vote.

Where did all the spending go specifically, you might ask? Well a majority of the money went to advertising through media resources. Examples of this would include the Robocall made by the GOP stating that Clinton is endorsing McCain. Another example is the Republican party calling Pennsylvania and Ohio voters and taking Obama's words about coal-burning technology out of context and claiming that he will "bankrupt the coal industry."

A lot of negative campaign still continuing with the Republican party. But, they are not only to blame for the spending. the Democratic party released a new TV ad highlighting Cheney's endorsement for McCain as Cheney states that he is "delighted to support John McCain."

The spending doesn't stop at media spending. The spending continues into the employment of people to support them. workers run around, going door-to-door asking people to support and vote for Barack Obama. It has been a tough run, but the candidates aren't stopping till the "fat lady sings."

Another GOP Robocall

The GOP released another Robocall featuring Hilary Clinton seemingly endorsing McCain by speaking out against Obama.

Of course, you shouldn't always believe what you hear. During the Democratic primary campaign, Clinton is quoted as saying "In the White House there is no time for speeches and on-the-job training. Senator McCain will bring a lifetime of experience to the campaign and Senator Obama will bring a speech that he gave in 2002. I think that is a significant difference." Although Clinton is heard saying this, she clearly states that she is not endorsing McCain.

A spokesperson for Clinton stated that "Senator Hillary Clinton does not approve this message, and as she crisscrosses the country, she has said time and again that the choice in this election could not be more clear. The McCain/Palin ticket offers only more of the same failed policies while the Obama/Biden ticket offers the vision, leadership and positive solutions we need. I wonder why the Republicans aren't using those words."

I Would Change My Vote To McCain Now That He Is Endorsed By My Favorite Deer Hunter, Dick Cheney!

So, with the final stretch to go, Dick Cheney endorses McCain. Oh dammit McCain, You were so close! Well here's a video of that.



And here's a random video I came across of a prank call made by a Quebec Comedy Show:

England likes to blow up Sarah Palin's image

The town of Battle, England demonstrated a traditional event where they blow up a likeness of a political character. In this case, the term "blow up" is used quite literally meaning to explode.

The people of Battle, England created an effigy of Governor Sarah Palin holding a machine gun with a slogan at the base saying "too hot to handle." After this effigy was created the people blew it up with fireworks and other explosives.

click here to see the picture

Organizers of the event stated that this "was not meant to cause offense."

The townspeople of Battle have been doing this since 1646. In recent years, the people have done the same thing with their last prime minister and Tony Blair.

Some Unwanted Press Coverage for Obama

A report came in to the news media saying that Obama's aunt was illegally living in South Boston. Further investigation of the matter was done. As it turned out, Obama's aunt had been living in America illegally for quite some time. In 2004, a official familiar with her specific case ordered her to leave. Somehow, she was able to allude this decree and remained in the United States.

Now, further investigation of this matter was brought onto the doorstep of Obama. When asked if he knew about his Aunt's immigration status, Obama commented by saying that he "didn't know her immigration status."

This immergence of new information regarding his Aunt's illegal immigration status 2 days before the election may prove to be somewhat difficult for Obama. I believe that if Obama doesn't follow his own rules for his immigration poilcy, it will look incredibly bad for him. How do you thnk this will affect his campaign? Do you think that it could affect voters' descision in whether to choose Obama or not?

Some Last Minuete SNL Laughs Before The Election

John McCain went on SNL yesterday to get some free press close to election day and show his lighter side. Personally, I thought he did a better job than Palin did and was pretty funny. Will this change the election? Well, maybe if it acts in concert with the double-maverick plan.




Saturday, November 1, 2008

Follow Up To Obama's Advertisement

According to the Wall Street Journal about 33.5 Million people watched the add on Wednesday. In order to see how large this is you could compare this to the combined audience of 30 million that would usually watch television on the same stations on a normal Wednesday night.

Less Police On The Streets? Another Ramification Of A Struggling Economy

Vallejo California, which recently filed for chapter eleven bankruptcy is losing almost 40% of its police force in the next few months due to decreases in officer pay. Like most other cities across the country, after 9/11 Vallejo put a greater price on safety and started offering more benefits and better salaries to officers. The result was the average police officer in Vallejo being payed 121,000 dollars in salary and if you include benefits, almost $190,000 in compensation. As house prices fell and so did tax revenue the city could no longer handle to pay so many officers, as well as the pensions of retired officers. This issue is not unique and might affect San Mateo at some point. Any thoughts about how less police would affect life? As a long boarder who is tired of being harassed by cops I would like to say this is a good thing, but as a citizen who values the positive affects police can have if violence occurs, I have to conclude that this is bad for people everywhere. Well maybe except for drug dealers...

Friday, October 31, 2008

Republicans For Obama

Lately we have been hearing a lot about Republicans who have vocally supported Barrack Obama for president, notably and most recently political pundit Stephen Colbert



Colin Powell, Secretary of State under Bush 43

Douglas Kmiec, Head of the Office of Legal Counsel under Reagan & Bush 41

Charles Fried, Solicitor General of the United States under Reagan

Rita Hauser, Former White House intelligence advisor under George W. Bush

Scott McClellan, Former Press Secretary to President George W. Bush

William Milliken
Former Governor of Michigan

Harris Fawell
, Former Congressman from Illinois

Claudine Schneider
, Former Congressman from Rhode Island

Lowell Weicker
, Former Governor and Senator from Connecticut

Larry Pressler, Former Senator from South Dakota

Charles Mathias
, Former United States Senator and Congressman from Maryland

Wayne Gilchrest
, Congressman from Maryland

Arne Carlson, Former Governor of Minnesota

William Weld, Former Governor of Massachusetts

Lincoln Chafee, Former United States Senator from Rhode Island

Jim Leach, Former Congressman from Iowa

Scott Bade also told me that the lauded magazine the Economist is also supporting Obama in this election and here is the link.
http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?source=most_commented&story_id=12516666

In the interest of not appearing so biased i also visited the Democrats for McCain site
http://www.democratsformccain.com/
but failed to find a list of notable Democrats supporting McCain in this election.

Have A Happy Halloween!!



Thursday, October 30, 2008

Biden Bags on McCain Economic Policy

Today, Biden said that John McCain and Sarah Palin had their economic policies upside down. Biden said "Ladies and gentlemen, what more evidence do we need that the Exxon Mobils of the world don't need a tax break? That $4 billion should go to middle class taxpayers, people who need the money. John [McCain] and Gov. [Sarah] Palin have this upside down. They literally have it upside down."

Biden's "slam" on McCain proved to have quite a positive effect on the Democratic supporters and som epotential swing voters using the example of the possible tax break that would be given to an oil company if McCain was elected.

Although the numbers do not lie, McCain accused Obama of being on the side of big oil companies. Obama responded to this by adding figures of what McCain would do if he was elected as the POTUS. McCain brought up the fact that Obama had voted for a renewable energy bill in 2005 that invloved the oil companies. Obama defended himself against McCain's accusation by saying that "given the makeup of congress, it was the best that they could do." It would seem that neither McCain nor Obama wants to take the side of oil companies.

No Socialist Party Nominee On The Ballot Today During The Mock Election?

The socialist candidate for president was shockingly not on the ballot today during the mock election disappointing all students who were willing to vote for someone in a mock election only on the grounds that the candidates name was very similar to his own.

In Related News
What does Carl Marx Put On His Pasta?

Communist Mannipesto

Possible President/Vice-Presidential Halloween Costumes?





Obama Is Friends With Bad People Part ? (can't remeber what part because this has happened too many times)

The McCain has started using robo-calls in many states, this time criticizing Obama for being involved with Chicago Business man Antoin Rezko who was convicted in June on corruption charges. Rezko raised funds in the past in support of Obama's campaign's and advised Obama about house purchases, even buying a property next to Obama's house and selling Obama some of the property. The Obama campaign responded to the accusation by calling the attacks "desperate" and bringing up the Keating scandal. This attack follows multiple attacks by the Republican's about Obama's character and patriotism including attacks about his relationships with Bill Ayers and Rashid Khaled. This campaign has most definitely taken a turn towards blatant mudslinging and attacks. The ironic thing about these character attacks is that McCain's running mate was probed earlier in the campaign about the inappropriate firing of an Alaska State Trooper for personal reasons, and recently has been investigated and reprimanded by the press using state funding to pay for her children's travel. Are McCain and Palin truly the crusaders against corruption they claim to be? I will let you answer that question.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Mature Adults or Children on a Playground?

Politics have evolved greatly within the US from when they had started. Politicians have always kept to the issues, providing information on their beliefs, and convincing fellow Americans to vote for their party because of their platforms. That concludes the positive campaigning, but what about all the negative campaigning? Since our first President there has always been negative campaigning. But since the invention of campaign ads on television, Politics has changed greatly in its negative campaigning. All over politicians used the television to communicate to all Americans providing an "inside look" on a candidate that may not be always true.

Senator Elizabeth Dole is no different from any of those politicians attempting to strike down their opponents by running negative campaign ads. Among the recent McCain attacks on Obama, Senator Elizabeth Dole ran an attack ad against Kay Hagan calling her "godless." Here is a video of that.



Dole's mudslinging tactics are but minuscule to the many attack ads that are constantly being made by many politicians. Polling had shown that voters are attracted to negative campaign ads, but do not necessarily like them. How do you feel about negative campaigns ads that are complete malarkey?

Oh No! Obama's At It Again!

Did you hear the news? Obama is associated with another "radical professor." Today Sarah Palin accused Obama of being associated to a Professor Rashid Khalid, who is supposedly a spokesperson of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Evidence backing up this claim included Obama being sighted at a farewell party for Khalid when Khalid was leaving to join another university in 2003, Khalid being of close to the same age of Barack, and that talking monkeys brought pictures showing secret meetings between Obama and Khalid. As you can tell by the tone of sarcasm, it would appear that the standard for actual evidence has declined. The Republican offensive has turned quite nasty. Although there is no proof associating Khalid with the PLO, the point is that the Republicans are accusing Obama of everything. Obama commented on this by saying that McCain was just "calling him every name in the book."

The Obama campaign stated that Palin's remarks were "another recycled, manufactured controversy from the McCain campaign to distract voters' attention from John McCain's lockstep support for George Bush's economic policies."

The McCain campaign, when asked why the attack after 6 months of the first article about Obama's possible relation to Khalid was published, responded by saying "Because we are one week away from potentially electing Barack Obama."

As it would show, the McCain Campaign is throwing out a last minute effort to make Obama look bad. What do you think though? Do you think these last minute attack ads are swaying any undecided voters? Do you think the ads reflect more on Obama or McCain?

Obama's American Stories Ad



Here is an embedded version of the thirty minute long advertisement that Mr. Obama's campaign spent 4 million dollars to put on major television stations earlier tonight. Though it has been criticized by the McCain Campaign as a stunt, I personally think that it is a smart tactic to leave a good last impression in voters minds close to election day. What do you guy's think? Will the advertisement be effective in getting voters to the polls? Was it a good idea this late in the game to make such a substantial move especially with a lead in the polls?

In other news John McCain was sounding rather senile recently, warning voters that "We're getting only a glimpse of what one-party rule will look like," while criticizing house and senate democrats for wanting to win more seats in government. Sounds a little two faced to me, at least I don't remember hearing any complaining from John McCain when the Republicans had a solid grip on the government.

Who Are The Real Americans Supporting On Election Day?

Among all of Sarah Palin's talk about the pro-American parts of America and pro-American American's, you might be asking yourself, who are the REAL Americans voting for? Well , considering that the real "original" Americans are technically native Americans, and that Native American tribes have donated more than one million dollars to Barrack Obama's campaign which trumps the amount gievn to the campaign of John McCain , I suppose who have your answer. Due to a tax loophole, Indian tribes are allowed to donate large amounts of money, $213,000 in the case of the Seneca nation, and during this election that money has been funneled to Barrack Obama. A honorary member of the Crow Nation, will most likely benefit from the Native American Vote in swing states like New Mexico. This loophole serves as a great example of the ways in which campaign contribution laws are not airtight and can allow interest groups, for example Indian nations that benefit from Casinos, to spend large amounts of money on campaigns.

Who Are The Real Americans Supporting On Election Day?

New Voters Are Swinging The Polls In Obama's Favor... Will They Vote On Election Day?

A poll conducted by NewsCorp from October 17-20 that asked new voters who they would be voting for and whether or not they were certain to vote, turned out some very interesting statistics. Though new voters favored Barrack Obama (69%) to John McCain (27%) only 60% of those polled said that they were certain to go to the polls on the 4th. When you compare this to the polls of all voters, in which 52% said they would vote for Obama, while 42% said they would vote for McCain, but 90% of of voters were certain they would vote , One might think that the current polls may not show this elections results. In a day where it has become very trendy to be registered to vote and seen sporting a T-Shirt supporting Mr. Obama one must ask how many of these "supporters" will actually make it to the polls on election day. This year will truly be the test of the willpower of America's youth to vote because if a "star candidate", a war, and a struggling economy are not enough to generate the desire among youth to have some say in political process what is?

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Poor choice of words leads to being bitten on the ass

The National Republican Campaign Committee has recently released multiple attack ads on US Democratic Senator John Murtha. In an interview, Murtha stated that there were "racists" in western Pennsylvania. He goes on to say that many people there were "rednecks." Although Murtha apologized for his comments made the day before, the impact on western Pennsylvanians was still great. Murtha had also stated in a previous interview that he predicted that Obama would win Pennsylvania in the election but it would be with little help from the western part of the state, including a portion of the state that he represented.

Murtha's public announcement of these predictions and beliefs proved to bite him on the ass as the National Republican Campaign Committee opened fire on this Democratic Senator.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0Gx8IAaRS0

Is Obama an Extremist bent on re-writing the Constituion or is Palin just confusing facts with garbage?

Sarah Palin accused Obama today of wanting to "re-write the Constitution." The potential VP attacked Obama's remark that he had made to a radio interview in 2001. Obama had stated on air that he wanted to "redistribute change." Palin assumed that Obama was talking about redistributing the wealth in America through the enforcement of the Supreme Court. but as more facts were revealed, it came to be known that Obama was discussing the courts in the context of the civil rights movement, and was not referring to taxes. In addition to the proper context of the qoute, Obama also stated that he thought that civil rights leaders shouldn't rely on the court system alone to affect social changes, and that calling for any redistribution of wealth belonged to the legislators.

Palin continued to say that a vote for Obama is a vote to allow a powerful, slightly executive portion of the government to sieze your property and your personal income and to distribute the wealth around with everyone else. Is Sarah Palin saying that a former constitutional law professor would allow and possibly encourage judges to "confiscate your property and your hard, all of your hard-earned money and then re-distribute that"? Further investigation of the matter showed that Obama's quote was taken out of context and that much of what Palin had said was a conjecture.