Since the 2021 storm on the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., by Trump supporters, there have been ongoing investigations on who is responsible for the violence that took place at the coup. The House committee has since joined the investigation and has concluded that they found evidence that exposes Trump’s inner circle of being aware of the riot and the possibilities of violence and did nothing to stop it.
Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff at the time, appointed by former President Trump, as well as other members of the right Freedom Caucus, have been discovered to be related to the conspiracy of Jan 6 and even encouraged supporters to join the march. The evidence from the House committee includes testimonies and other materials like text messages and phone calls involving Representative Scott Perry and Jim Jordan, President Trump, and other Republican government officials. The most convincing evidence entails over 2,000 text messages between former President Trump and Meadows that described the works behind the scenes of getting Trump allies and Republican lawmakers to attempt to overthrow election results. This most likely started the false allegations that the election was stolen and that there was miscounts in votes and/or voter fraud.
The main purpose of the investigation for the committee and the Justice Department is to find who can be accountable for the violence at the Capitol that resulted in 5 casualties and had Senators and Representatives fearing for their safety. The House committee is claiming that Meadows was involved with the conspiring the plan as well as being warned and aware of potential violence, but did nothing to stop it. Meadow has been avoiding and blocking the House committee’s requests for him to testify in court. Meadow’s testimony could provide insight into the involvement of Republican members in Trump and his ally's attempt to overthrow the 2020 election. As of now, investigations are still ongoing and as more evidence comes out, people will be held accountable.
Questions:
How do you think the government officials involved in the rally should be punished? Versus the supporters who participated in the rally?
Did Congress effectively deal with the aftermath?
Sources:
https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/mark-meadows-texts-2319/index.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/25/mccarthy-border-trump-biden/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/23/meadows-jan6-secret-service-committee-testimony/
5 comments:
I think that the government officials should receive equal punishment as the supporters who participated in the rally. Although these officials may not have used violence in public, they helped support the rally and did nothing to stop it. They were supporters and because they are government officials, they have more power to influence people. They need to be held accountable for the power that they hold. Ultimately, I think that this is a good step for Congress in terms of the January 6th investigation, but I think that they need to continue to continue to investigate.
Government officials should also be punished, possibly harsher than those who partook in the riots. Those in power knew about critical access points into the White House, and enabled Trump's base to create chaos. This was possibly the largest breach of Democracy ever in American history, and it must be handled that way. Many of the rioters are being apprehended through FBI phone tracing, but it wouldn't be surprising if more government officials were also caught. The current Senate is split pretty evenly between parties, so even if Congress pursues this investigation, I wonder how long it will take to prosecute individuals.
https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm
I think they should be punished for conspiring against the government and be held to the same standards as people participating in the rally at the minimum, however it’s unlikely given a sizable portion of the public sentiment supports them, and like Darshan said the Congress is split. If they go unpunished it could set a bad precedent for future cases leading Republicans to believe they could get away with another similar if not worse attack. The charges on the people participating in the protest are light, most are charged for obstruction of justice and assault at worst, because the court considers the protest an Article 1 freedom of speech and assembly right, when it could also be considered an attack against American democracy. I think they should be punished more harshly especially in light of new evidence, it puts their actions more solidly in the category of a self-coup. But it makes sense that it is not being judged as a self-coup because the public backlash would add fuel to the fire and feed Republican propaganda as people start feeling like their Constitutional rights are being threatened.
The government officials should definitely be held accountable especially considering that there is evidence that they have been correlated to the attacks. Punishments can include fines or inability to continue being public officials for a period of time. If there is enough evidence, I would consider sending them to jail using the courts but that may be very hard to do. I think Meadow should face the greatest punishment as his actions just scream that he is guilty as he is not testifying in court and is the most connected with the idea that Trump’s allies encouraged the January 6th attack which was horrendous and dangerous for our democracy.
It’s super hard to punish everybody that was in the protest because you can’t really keep track of everybody and who actually participated. However, with the information we have, they should definitely punish some people. I think these people should be punished by going to jail along with other things due to vandalism, violence, and more.
Congress hasn’t really dealt very well with the aftermath in my opinion. It’s been over a year and they're just finding out that Trump allies knew and they're still not really doing anything about it. There’s still a threat that this can happen in the future which means the problem is most definitely not solved.
I think that all government officials involved should not retain their positions given the drastic effects of the insurrection. Given the enhanced influence that leaders in American government possess, actions promoting/threatening overriding the democratic election process pose immense risks for the safety of people in government overseeing election procedures (such as Congress people who were present in the Capitol Building), along with the system itself which has been created to ensure peaceful transfer of power regardless of election outcome. The supporters who participated in the rally are much more difficult to identify so it is virtually inevitable for there to be many instances in which they are not held accountable, however those caught and identified should be tried and their punishment determined in the federal court system based on the severity of their transgressions. I do not believe that congress handled the aftermath well as it seems as though everything has been largely delayed and not-prioritized. January 6th will be forever remembered and taught, however congress's urgency has not been proportional to the magnitude and effects of the event which surprises me a bit. The relevance of new information being uncovered now (far from the date of the insurrection itself) seems undermined by this delay, and it feels as though things are almost moving backwards for the House committee to now push for Meadows's testimony. Despite action being taken at a later stage than expected or which would have been optimal, it is important to highlight that involved parties will be held accountable for involvement in the insurrection and for justice to be pursued.
Post a Comment