Sunday, March 2, 2025

Trumps First Month in Office

    Trump's first month in office has been a stressful time for many, with many workers being laid off and anger in government with the executive decision to create DOGE to cut “excess” federal spending, the first month has been nothing short of eventful. 

On January 20th 2025, President Trump signed an executive order creating DOGE, a temporary organization led by Elon Musk, with the goal of reducing wasteful federal spending and eliminating excessive regulations. This was a surprise to many as people are angered that Trump is able to make this happen. The democrats have complained that elon musk is in no way cut out to be in control of government and it is dangerous to give him this much power.

The next day President Trump’s immigration policies sparked legal and political controversy. His national emergency declaration at the U.S.–Mexico border redirected military funds for a border wall, raising concerns over executive overreach. Labeling Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations strengthened federal action but risked escalating tensions with Mexico. His attempt to end birthright citizenship challenged the 14th Amendment, facing legal backlash. Supporters saw these moves as necessary for national security, while critics argued they undermined constitutional rights and congressional authority.

On the 23rd of January, a highlight for many, Trump signed off on the declassification of assassination records, Trump explained he wants to promote transparency, allowing the public to access previously hidden information about historically significant events. It helps address lingering doubts, supports historical research, and strengthens trust in government by reducing secrecy around major political assassinations.

On the 28th the government made the Deferred Resignation offer likely aimed to reduce the federal workforce in a controlled manner by incentivizing voluntary resignations. By allowing employees to resign early while still receiving salary and benefits for several months, the government could cut long-term payroll costs, streamline operations, and manage budget constraints without abrupt layoffs. This approach also helps employees transition smoothly to new opportunities rather than facing immediate job loss.

On February 6th Trumps administration announced the dismantling of USAID, which involved plans to reduce around 2,000 domestic positions within the agency and place global personnel on leave, signaling a significant shift in U.S. foreign aid and international development priorities. USAID, which has historically played a key role in providing aid to developing countries, promoting democracy, and addressing global challenges like poverty and disease, faced substantial cuts under this initiative. Proponents of the decision argued that it would reduce government spending and refocus foreign aid efforts, while critics saw it as a retreat from international leadership, potentially undermining humanitarian efforts and the U.S.'s influence on the global stage. The move also raised concerns about the long-term impact on global stability and development.

Trumps CPAC speech on February 22nd, President Trump highlighted key accomplishments of his administration, including tax cuts, deregulation, and a tough stance on immigration. He also emphasized his efforts to strengthen the economy, secure the southern border, and challenge the political establishment. Trump framed his presidency as a fight against corruption and globalism, positioning himself as a champion for the American people. He reiterated his opposition to the radical left and showed confidence in the continued strength of the conservative movement.
To top off it off in in a tense meeting at the White House, President Trump and JD Vance joined Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval Office, where the conversation quickly escalated into a shouting match. Trump attempted to assert dominance, trying to come across as tough and "alpha," but instead just looked childish, arguing for the sake of arguing. JD Vance, trying to bring a level-headed approach, emphasized that diplomacy was the key to ending the war between Ukraine and Russia. Zelensky, however, explained that his country had already made numerous attempts to negotiate and signed agreements with Putin, only to have them broken every time. The atmosphere grew more uncomfortable as Trump and Vance pressured Zelensky, effectively making him beg for America's continued support, warning that Ukraine would crumble without it. Meanwhile, those present couldn't help but mock Zelensky’s attire, as he was dressed casually, not in the typical suit expected in the White House. By the end of the meeting, Trump and Vance’s approach had shifted global perceptions, leaving many seeing America more as a bully than a leader.

Trump's first month has been packed with controversy as expected, but hopefully he can make up for some of his decisions and become the leader he needs to be.


Sources:

Concerns about DOGE

 Well known Billionaire and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, Elon Musk, has been appointed by President Trump to be the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Which is a new department Trump has made to cut unnecessary federal spending. 



DOGE is tasked with identifying wasteful expenditures and implementing measures to streamline government operations. Its mission includes reforming policies and evaluating federal agencies to cut costs, often through privatization or eliminating redundant services. However, the department’s push for cost-saving measures could come at the expense of critical public services, making it a potential threat to programs that support vulnerable communities.

Musk came up as a self made tech genius comin dropping out of stanford after being accepted for physics, and made to tech startups in the “Dotcom boom” era, one notable startup being paypal. He then ploughed his fortune into SpaceX and Tesla which panned out well for him. Musk is a very debatable business man as he has made risky statements regarding what he has planned for the future of his business regarding human advancements. In the 2024 election he endorsed Trump and has become close friends with him. Enough to become the president of a federal spending department in government. Notice how not once has his past had anything to do with the government.




Musk’s experience in the private sector has largely been focused on pushing for less regulation and more market-driven solutions. Like trying to find cost effective ways to make profit. While this works well for a tech billionaire like Musk, the public sector operates under very different priorities. Government agencies are responsible for addressing social equity and public well-being, not maximizing profit margins. Musk’s approach could favor privatization, potentially leading to the loss of vital public services that many people rely on for their livelihoods, including healthcare, education, and social programs.


One of the most pressing concerns is Musk’s stated desire to reduce federal spending, which could result in cuts to essential social programs. If DOGE pushes to cut services that protect vulnerable populations, such as affordable housing, food assistance, and healthcare for the elderly—could be severely reduced. These cuts could disproportionately affect low-income communities and marginalized groups who are already living paycheck to paycheck or dealing with limited access to basic services.



Additionally, Musk’s lack of experience in managing public services raises doubts about his ability to implement policies that prioritize people over profits. While his companies like SpaceX and Tesla thrive in a competitive, capitalist environment, the role of the government is inherently  different. Public services are not designed to make a profit but to meet the needs of all citizens. If Musk’s policies mirror the business strategies that made him a billionaire, we could see the most vulnerable members of society left behind in favor of efficiency goals that only benefit the wealthy.


Ultimately, while efficiency is a necessary goal for the government, it must not come at the expense of equity. If Musk’s leadership at DOGE has the mindset of a business, over providing equitable access to services, we could see even greater divisions in society. The future of programs that millions rely on is uncertain. But hopefully Musk will come with the mindset of keeping the people first and making sure the vulnerable are being protected.




Sources:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/doge/elon-musk-trump-doge-executive-order-rcna191751 

https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/elon-musk 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp820y16xvlo 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61234231 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyjz24ne85o 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-doge-elon-musk-findings-trump/ 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/musk-treasury-social-security-access-federal-payment-system-trump/