Sunday, November 10, 2024

A Super PAC for the Super Wealthy: Why Elon Musk Invested in Trump’s Victory

Elon Musk invested millions into Donald Trump's 2024 Victory, but why?

    

As the richest man in the world with an incredibly popular social media platform, electric car company, and space exploration company, Musk has a notable influence in the political world when he wants to. Musk’s America PAC is a super PAC started by himself and contributed to by other billionaires such as Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, founders of a Silicon Valley venture capitalist firm. Besides the sheer amount of money being funneled into the PAC, what’s so super about it? There is a big difference between Super PACs, PACs, and interest groups. 

To start with the grassroots, interest groups are organizations that have a stake in a specific issue, such as abortion, gun violence/rights, or environmental impacts. These groups seek to influence public policy from the local to national level. They can endorse a candidate who they believe would support their endeavors, but they cannot donate money to a political campaign. Broadening up are PACs or Political Action Committees that are usually committed to or against a candidate. They raise money to donate but have strict contribution limits to campaigns. They can run advertisements, encourage groups of people to vote, push certain issues on the public they believe are the most important, etc. A Super PAC is not withheld by donations limitations as a PAC is because they do not work directly with a campaign. Musk’s America PAC is independent of Trump’s campaign by law but can run ads and hold rallies. 

Besides having some money to spend, many politicians and economists have assessed what’s in it for Musk. Investors assessed as early as the morning after the election that Tesla’s stocks would skyrocket with Trump’s presidential victory. CNN reports: “That lifted the value of the 411 million shares of Tesla that Musk owns outright by more than $15 billion, which works out to a 12,761% return on the $119 million he donated to Trump”. This pulled Tesla out of the stock market slump it has been in for the past couple of years. Musk succeeded in getting his name back out in the public eye as the key donator to Trump’s successful political campaign. 

In addition to Trump’s commitment to tax cuts for the ultra wealthy, he has not campaigned as a candidate committed to reversing climate change. Whereas many democrats have pushed for a complete transition to electric cars in the coming decades, Trump has promised to repeal any attempts to do so. For Musk, this eliminates much of the competition Tesla faces in the EV industry. Elon Musk remains a household name and Tesla as a leader in electric vehicles globally.


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/04/us/elections/musk-america-pac-trump-voters.html

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/16/g-s1-28591/elon-musk-donald-trump-america-pac-fec

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/06/business/elon-musk-election-bet/index.html

 


Thursday, November 7, 2024

Bernie Sanders: Democratic Party "has abandoned working class people"

On Nov. 6, independent Senator Bernie Sanders was re-elected to a fourth term in the U.S. Senate, and along with it, issued a scathing message to the Democratic Party on the topic of Donald Trump’s return to power, writing that "It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them."



It is reasonable to argue that the Democratic Party is now the party of the so-called urban elites, just simply looking at voting maps by county. But swaths of the Latino coalition have been ceded to Trump, the working class no longer backs Democrats, and Harris underperformed in nearly every single county that mattered (hint: that’s not called underperforming, that’s called losing), and while I hate to give the extremist MAGA movement the satisfaction, it is increasingly clear that the Democratic Party is out of touch.

According to Shawn Hubler of the New York Times, “abstract truths mattered less, voters said, than tangible issues, like the ability to pay rent or concerns over border crossings. In a time of widespread distrust in institutions, Ms. Harris’s call to protect the nation’s norms rang hollow for many Americans.”

In short, as real as protecting democracy and fighting fascism is, it fell flat. An unpopular vice president was unable to build a case for change with the baggage of an unpopular administration, and the call to arms to fight for democracy appeared high-minded and overly idealistic or even fluffy to voters, confining Harris’s appeal to well-off, well educated groups and skipping over the tens of millions of Americans who don’t have space of mind to stress about fascism because they’re stressing about putting food on the table, taking care of their sick mother, and putting their kids through school.

Returning to Sanders’ statement, Trump and the Republican base, for a brief moment, ignoring their terrible and dehumanizing messaging, tapped into a real anger that exists within the American people, an anger and a desire to see the fall of the establishment.

“I am not better off than I was 4 years ago” is the common sentiment for voters leaning towards Trump, fantasy nostalgia of no wars and a good economy, even as everything came crashing down in the second half of his term, and the convenient memory omission of the pure inefficiency, wild unpredictability, and at times, incompetence of the administration as a whole. This can be seen in all the interviews with undecided voters published by the New York Times and the Washington Post.

While Harris focused on relating with voters through TikTok content and securing endorsements from big-name celebrities, they could not shake the baggage of the current deeply unpopular administration. America wanted change, and Harris did not give it to them. Like James Carville says, change has the advantage.




In the aftermath of the Harris-Trump debate, I wrote this: “I know we need to defeat Donald Trump, and if we do that through watered-down moderate policies, that is something I’m okay with, because a Harris win will improve the standing of this country. But at the same time, it feels like we are always postponing real change.”

And now, it is clear that not only has America postponed real change, it is on a path backwards. The progressive push that kicked off with the Obama administration and pushed through the social justice campaigns of Black Lives Matter have been effectively radicalized, demonized, and positioned as anti-American. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg talks about “reclaiming language” from the conservative branch of our nation, and he is correct: MAGA Republicans have capitalized on the American ideals of freedom and family, and redefined them in their own image. Progressivism in America has been largely trashed by remarkable smear campaigns across the aisle.

But it is not progressivism that is failing America. Looking at the votes, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez outperformed Harris even in New York. It could also just be that Harris was bogged down by the unpopular administration and was unable to effectively convey her message properly: Harris leaning consistently moderate as Trump, Project 2025, and company yanked right didn’t sway moderate voters like polls showed, rather it just normalized extremist policies. Additionally, the immovability of Democrats in far-left policies rather than getting back to the bread and butter of feeding and clothing every American didn’t ring across the country; that is to say, the Democrats moved too radically on policies that weren’t fundamental to most Americans and this allowed the Republicans to scapegoat them. Perception is everything.

Yes, Harris didn't have enough time to mount a truly successful campaign. Then again, one look at the overwhelming red wave across the nation (county by county) highlights the failure of the Democratic Party to truly understand the average American's concern.

We must return to the basics: there is majority support in the American population for public universal healthcare coverage, a majority of Americans support the continued existence and bolstering of gun laws, a majority of Americans support free education. As Tim Walz put it best earlier in the campaign (when they had arguably a lot more momentum), feeding kids and taking care of your mother are not radical ideas. Sanders echoes this.



What Sanders writes about is not just about Harris/Walz, it’s a lack of sufficient, digestible liberal populism with wide enough appeal to capture a decent segment of the American electorate. In an era of antiestablishment sentiment and dissatisfaction with the status quo, there needs to be a Democratic candidate that embodies populism in the middle class at a time when Democrats are continuously ceding the working class vote to Republicans. It’s not about leaning more right, campaigning heavily with Cheneys and conservative icons, or talking up gun ownership like Harris did, it’s about nailing messaging on the fundamental issues that affect everybody, that turn the average citizen into a warrior and champion rather than talking down to them about the death of democracy.

Hindsight, of course, is 20/20. The midterms in 2026 and the presidential election in 2028 will be a test to see whether Democrats understand the current political climate and are able to put together a populist coalition to meet the Republicans on their level, or whether the Democratic Party is an out-of-touch elite machine that will continue crumbling into the ground.

How Trump Connected With So Many Americans - The New York Times

Opinion | The Real Reason Harris and the Democrats Lost to Trump - The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/06/us/politics/harris-voters-democracy.html

Bernie Sanders blasts Democratic Party following Kamala Harris loss - ABC News

AOC wins reelection as voters determine fate of remaining members of House 'Squad'

‘Trump’s America’: His Comeback Victory Signals a Different Kind of Country - The New York Times

Health Care and Public Opinion - PMC

Democrats overwhelmingly favor free college tuition, while Republicans are divided by age, education

A Party of Prigs and Pontificators Suffers a Humiliating Defeat - The New York Times

NY Democratic Congressman Says Best Ally to Trump Was 'The Far Left' - Newsweek

Opinion | James Carville, the Cajun Who Can’t Stop Ragin’ - The New York Times

James Carville Blames Democrats' Losses on 'Woke Era' Politics - Newsweek

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Russia Targets and Threatens U.S Voters in 2024 Election

 In recent news, Russia has been acting, as the FBI states, as “the most active threat” for the U.S election 2024 and the weeks that follow.

While other foreign adversaries have also been involved in threats, Russia has played the biggest role. Russia’s main source of threat is their published videos that spread false information on Democratic voters in an attempt to raise more support for Trump and more distrust within the Democratic Party. Videos like these depict someone associated with the Democratic Party taking a bribe, an immigrant voicing how he is going to illegally vote for Harris in two separate countries, and even videos where they themselves pretended to be the FBI discussing how they are “arresting groups linked to the Democratic Party for ballot fraud”, the U.S News shares. All of which were fake scenarios. These videos are very similar to the propaganda we’ve seen Trump publish, except the fact that it’s coming from a source outside of the U.S. While this is not surprising given the U.S's historical feud with Russia, it still raises great concern.

     While the FBI has gone on to try and debunk these lies, concerns over the future of the dangers remain, especially with AI technology advancing and expanding in popularity. Even more frightening, it doesn’t just stop at cyber threats, bomb threats were also sent to polling sites in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania - which are all of course swing states, another attempt at preventing Democratics from voting. Although the FBI soon found out that these were all hoaxes, it instilled a lot of fear in voters and citizens within these states and the country as a whole. Could people's fear still have
remained and affected who voted even after it had been announced as false? Afterall, Trump did take victory in the election. It would not be unfair to assume that being targeted for bomb threats would scare away voters and misleading information online would instill distrust that then prevents voting action.

It’s truly alarming the extent to which other countries and even our own like with January 6th, are willing to go through just to get their political opinion on an election publicized and turn the odds in their favor. Violence should never be the answer to responding to simply differing opinions.








https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/russia-and-iran-ramping-up-influence-campaigns-targeting-us-voters-federal-agencies-say


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/04/us/politics/election-threats-russia.html


https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-05/fbi-russia-poses-most-active-threat-on-election-day


https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/11/06/how-russia-attempted-to-influence-the-us-presidential-election-a86925


Michelle Obama Speaks at Kamala's Campaign With a Plea for Women's Rights

     The election has taken the world by storm and celebrities participating and endorsing political candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, has been a subject of much controversy. However, it’s not just pop stars like Taylor Swift showing their support. Recently Michelle Obama made a speech at Harris’s campaign stressing the importance of women’s rights, specifically abortion.

She warns, on the behalf of women, that “a vote for him is a vote against us”, referring to Trump’s actions towards overturning Roe v. Wade. She then goes on to emphasize how this decision will not only affect women but also men, in an attempt to raise even more support for Harris for men who assume this matter does not pertain to them: “The devastating consequences of teen pregnancy won’t just be borne by young girls, but also by the young men who are the fathers”. Additionally, she went on to discuss how not only is Trump a poor candidate to help meet the needs of women’s health, but the trend of having male politicians making decisions that regard women’s health is wrong.

  

Obama has already done lots of work advocating for women’s rights that she’s continued outside of her husband’s former presidency, such as her advocation for young girl’s education with her Let Girls Learn program. So, given Obama’s history, it is no surprise that this issue is one she is the most passionate about, especially given she has two daughters.

Given her credibility, it is safe to say that Obama is very qualified to speak out on these subjects. Not to mention, the fact that she does so in a way that also raises support for the candidate she holds the most trust in, just increases the significance of her speech. We need more people like her using their platform and popularity for the benefit of the country and educate the youth. This has become more and more important as the younger generations trust only what they see online. Similar to what we learned in the beginning of the year about the change over time from more traditional media platforms like newspapers and news stations on TV to what we know today as social media and the internet. Overall, it seems that while there is a lot of push back on celebrities endorsing candidates, this really is necessary to increase younger voter turnout and raise awareness on the importance of the policies each candidate supports or opposes.



https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/us/politics/michelle-obama-speech-harris-michigan.html


https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/10/26/2024-election-campaign-updates-harris-trump/


https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/michelle-obama-harris-rally/index.html


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/us/politics/harris-michelle-obama-michigan.html



Monday, November 4, 2024

The Death of the Leader of Hamas, and What Does This Mean for the U.S.?

     With elections right around the corner, something happened that may alter the war in Gaza. On October 16th, 2024 the leader of the group Hamas, who was elected Hamas political bureau in August 2024 was found dead. He was best known as the mastermind of Hamas’s October 7th, 2023 attack on Israel. He was thought to be undercover most of the time after the attack.

    What does this mean for the war in Gaza? Well, many articles said that the war isn’t over but it moved to a new phrase, what that phase is, many people are unsure, but many believe that the end of the war is near. Before his death, Sinwar seemed very opposed to the idea of compromise, so his death made a settlement more of a possibility. But at the same time, Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that Singer's death “settled the score” but the war in Gaza would not stop until all the hostages were safely returned. There has been communication between the US and Israel, but mostly about the celebration of Singer's death, but Biden has a plan to convince Israel to focus on the conflict in Gaza. Biden will most likely further use Singer's death to push the Prime minister of Israel to end the war in Gaza. Still, the Prime Minister wants to wait for Biden’s term to be over, hoping there will be a better connection and relationship with either Trump or Harris.

    President Biden has said that the death of Sinwar is good news after two decades of Hamas’s rule over Gaza,
"for Israel, for the United States, and for the world." Other U.S. officials also agree and say that it brings new hope for a suspension in the year-long war. American diplomats say it is definitely a great success but they see many challenges ahead. Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, a resident senior fellow with the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative said, "Israel, Arab nations, and the United States should now offer mass amnesty for remaining Hamas members who lay down their arms and stop fighting," he added. "They should also offer financial rewards to those who either turn in Israeli hostages or provide information leading to the whereabouts of remaining abductees." To simplify this he said that the U.S. as an ally should help in whatever they can, in this case financially should help. The US, Israel's main weapon supplier, has actively supported Iran-supported groups like Hama, which they call terrorist groups, but tensions have been higher as the US officials push Israel to improve living circumstances in Gaza and cut back striking residential areas. The US is hoping for a change as this year-long war has gone on for too long. As U.S. elections are around the corner, Israel is trying to weaken Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. They want to establish control over areas to create changes before a new president takes office. Israel wants to ensure that its enemies and their chief patron, Iran, don't regroup and threaten Israeli citizens again. But, Biden has taken this opportunity to tell the Prime Minister of Israel, Netanyahu, that Sinwar had a lot of blood on his hands and it was a perfect opportunity to make peace. Biden and I think everyone wants to see this problem resolved. 


Sources:

- https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/after-hamas-leader-yahya-sinwars-death/story?id=114924572

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/after-sinwars-death-israel-aims-lock-strategic-gains-before-us-election-2024-10-18/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-yahya-sinwar-hamas-leader-killed-gaza-war-reaction-biden-netanyahu/

https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-does-yahya-sinwars-death-mean









Donald Trump's and Kamala Harris’s Big Weekend Events

    With two weeks left before election day, Presidential Candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump had a busy weekend. On Saturday, in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump took off his suit jacket and put on his apron and handed french fries through a drive through where tons of people lined the restaurant to watch. Also In Pennsylvania, later in a rally, Donald Trump claimed that Harris was a liar for saying she worked at McDonalds, when he said that with no evidence whatsoever. 

This past Weekend, Kamala Harris had multiple events lined up for her, from talking in rallies with Usher and Lizzo, to interviews, and all while celebrating her birthday. Harris celebrated her 60th birthday in Atlanta where she visited and talked at two churches: New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, and Divine Faith Ministries International in Jonesboro. In these services she talked about her religious upbringing as a child and how they influenced her political career. Harris in this service said, "Do we have leaders in place who understand that in the face of a stranger one should see a neighbor," which emphasizes the need for unity that Harris wants to bring for the American people. She also talked about the gospel of Luke where it talks about being a good samaritan which she said, "As the good Samaritan reminds us, it is not enough to preach the values of compassion and respect. We must live with them.” This is where she reminds the American people to not only say whatever comes to mind, but actually live by what you say. This shows how Harris is deeply connected to the community of all kinds. But before her birthday, American rapper and Singer Lizzo and American singer-songwriter Usher joined her. Usher spoke about the importance of voting and how the people can make a difference, he told the people, “Let’s vote for a future!” Haris also made an appearance in Detroit with Lizzo, where Lizzo said that Detroit is the last vote Harris needed in order to win it all, where she then said that she already had voted for Harris. Lizzo also said, “If you ask me if America is ready for its first woman president, I only have one thing to say: It’s about damn time!” referring to one of her songs. 

In a rally at Lakewood Amphitheater, Harris talked about abortion laws, which she further talked about Amber Turner. Amber Turner, a 28 year old mother, with a 6 year old child died in 2022. This was due to a delay in care for a complication that occurred when she took an abortion pill. This is all due to abortion bans which Harris say, “are preventing doctors from providing basic medical care,” Harris also says, "Women are bleeding out in parking lots, turned away from emergency rooms, losing their ability to ever have children again... and now women are dying," Harris keep going back to this issue as she talked about this in September and talked about it again in her october Georgia rally. In her rally this past weekend she said that, “Donald Trump still refuses to take accountability, to take any accountability, for the pain and the suffering he has caused," She specifically said his name because Trump overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 which was the year that Amber Turner died. Harris is trying to fox all the mistakes that were had in the past, she made that clear in all the events she had this past weekend. 


Sources:

https://theatlantavoice.com/pastor-jamal-braynts-mesage-to-vp-kamala-harris-you-were-born-for-such-a-time-as-this/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-recruits-pop-stars-usher-lizzo-swing-state-pushes-tight-race

https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/kamala-harris-lizzo-detroit-1235805990/

https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/kamala-harris-lakewood-amphitheatre-atlanta-rally/85-c950bb65-0556-44f4-ac8f-12115b59514f

https://www.11alive.com/article/news/state/kamala-harris-statement-amber-thurman-georgia-death-abortion-ban-propublica-report/85-c57d3147-2b40-4683-8695-2ef258869d90


Harris makes surprise appearance on SNL, violating FCC “Equal Time” rule.

In the days leading up to the election tomorrow night, both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have been campaigning non-stop in efforts to sway any remaining undecided voters in their favor. Harris took a break from the campaign trail this past weekend to make a special appearance on popular late night television show, Saturday Night Live. Not only has the skit that she participated in angered the Trump campaign, poking fun at his actions earlier in the week, such as working at a McDonalds, but Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulator Brendan Carr, has come forward on social media platform “X” claiming that by appearing on the show, Harris was making “a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule.”

As we learned earlier in the year, the Equal Time rule was put into place many decades ago with the rise of radio and television to limit any partisanship from the broadcasting companies. The rule is supposed to enforce that broadcasters must give all candidates the same amount of coverage and interview opportunities, in order to not unfairly influence the results of an election. However, despite Carr’s statement, the FCC has yet to take action in light of the accusation, with a spokesperson stating that “The FCC has not made any determination regarding political programming rules, nor have we received a complaint from any interested parties.”


While the Trump campaign may not have complained about the unfairness yet, it doesn’t change the fact that Harris’s appearance was technically in violation of the rule in the eyes of the FCC. In order to correct this, NBC, the same network that SNL airs on, gave Trump a spot airing after coverage of a NASCAR race Sunday. In an effort to give equal time after Harris’s SNL appearance, Trump gave a “Special Message” to viewers while posing in front of American flags. Yet this doesn’t completely fix the problem, as differing viewership of each program may mean that Trump needs to receive more time in order for the equal time rule to be met. This is a prime example of how the media has changed the way that candidates campaign. Rules like the equal time rule are in place to try and maintain the democratic nature of our elections, but they also may add more complexities and draw focus from the actual issues at hand.


Outside of the FCC debate, the choice to appear on a live television show was a risky one for the Harris campaign. There’s no going back if anything goes wrong, no editing out jokes that are too offensive after the fact. But it was a risk that the Harris campaign chose to take, just as several previous presidential candidates have done, including Trump himself in 2015. So while the Harris campaign is going from campaign event to event, one must question if going on SNL was worth it. With polls in key battleground states as close as ever, one can argue that the appearance had very little impact on Harris’s success. Not even official polls can agree on who is ahead in the race, with an ABC poll putting Harris at 49% of the vote to Trump's 46%, yet another NBC news poll having the candidates tied at 49%. In the end, the choice to go on SNL may have only reached a marginal amount of voters who weren’t already planning on supporting Harris, and this late in the game, there isn’t much impact that her appearance may have had. Whether or not Harris wins on Election Day tomorrow (or in the days that follow), the truth is that there is no way to know whether or not this appearance, or any of the other last minute campaign events are going to have an impact on the results.


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/02/us/politics/kamala-harris-snl.html 


https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/kamala-harris-snl-fcc-rule-violated-trump-commissioner-1236198975/


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/03/harris-appearance-snl-equal-time-rule


https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/11/03/trump-vs-harris-2024-polls-trump-up-in-3-new-surveys-harris-leads-in-2-others/ 


Sunday, November 3, 2024

Shifting Tides in Iowa: Harris Gains Unexpected Lead in Key Swing State

 Shocking results came out from the final Iowa Poll before Election Day from the Des Moines Register and Mediacom. The poll concluded that Vice President Harris now holds 47% to former president Trump’s 44% among likely voters in Iowa.The results indicate a shift toward Harris, compared to the previous Iowa Poll in September, which showed Trump with a slight lead. In that poll, 47% of likely voters supported Trump, while 43% favored Harris. 

Iowa has a mixed history in the last four presidential elections. In 2008 and 2012, Barack Obama won the state, while Trump won the state in both the 2016 and the 2020 election. This mixed voting pattern is reflective of Iowa’s swing state status, where voter’s preference depends on the election cycle and candidate, and can shift the state’s voting outcome. The state’s blend of urban, suburban and rural voters is one of the factors contributing to the diverse political leanings. 

As well as its mixed demographics, Iowa is also a state where the first caucus is hosted. The Iowa caucus is significant in the U.S. presidential election process as it is the first major electoral event of the primary season. Held in January or February of election years, the Iowa caucuses kick off the selection of each party’s nominee, giving Iowa an out sized influence in shaping the race. This focus can intensify the competition in the state, as candidates see it as an opportunity to gain early momentum, making it a battleground where outcomes are less predictable.

This result from the Des Moines Register poll came as a complete surprise to political observers, as almost no analysts predicted Harris will be leading against Trump. Neither candidate had campaigned in the state, since Trump has easily won the state for the last two elections. 

The shift in Iowa’s favored candidate can be traced to the voter's gender and age. The new poll finds women in the state largely favor Harris over Trump, 56% to 36%, while male support Trump by a narrower margin, 52% to 38%. The survey also suggests that older voters are firmly in Harris’ support, with 55% of likely voters ages 65 or older backing her, to 36% for Trump, while likely voters younger than 35 split almost evenly, 46% Harris to 44% Trump.

Harris’s lead in the poll is fueled by substantial support from female voters, particularly older women in Iowa, who may feel a personal resonance with her platform or identity. If this trend of voters with sympathetic connections to Harris grows in swing states such as Iowa, the current tight race could widen, giving Harris a possible advantage. This presidential election appears too close to call, leaving the final decision up to the people of the country.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/02/politics/iowa-poll-harris-trump/index.html  
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/02/harris-leading-trump-iowa-poll-presidential-election-.html 
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/2024/11/02/iowa-poll-kamala-harris-leads-donald-trump-2024-presidential-race/75354033007/ 
https://history.iowa.gov/history/education/educator-resources/primary-source-sets/caucuses-and-elections 
https://www.pewresearch.org/religious-landscape-study/database/state/iowa/party-affiliation/ 
 

Empowering Young Voices:The 'Cancel Out' Trend Among Young Voters

 

With election day just around the corner, a new movement on social media is catching voter’s attention. Voting to “cancel out” someone’s vote on the opposite political spectrum is becoming an increasingly popular topic within the young voters this election season. 

While votes does not necessarily “cancel” eachother out, this trend has made a often tension filled and stressful topic feel more, lighthearted and approachable. First-time voter McKenzie Owens, 19, told NBC News, the trend can make others realize “that people can co-exist even though nowadays politics can also drive people apart.”


While technically a single vote doesn’t "cancel out" another in the literal sense, the movement seems to have succeeded in encouraging voter participation by giving people an accessible, lighthearted angle to engage with the voting process. In many cases, social media users keep their political leanings private, but some have voiced support for Kamala Harris, playfully citing a goal to "cancel out" a loved one’s vote for Donald Trump.


Vice President Kamala Harris’s 20-point lead over former President Trump between voters ages of 18 to 34 strongly indicates her popularity amongst young voters.The “cancel out” trend gaining attention on Social media platforms that are also mainly occupied by younger audiences, could be a beneficial move for the democratic nominee. Harris’s campaign has the opportunity to increase young voter turnouts as well as increasing competition in swing state youth demographics. 


According to a poll conducted by Pew Research, on average 85% of parents who identify as Republican/ Democrat have a teenager who identifies with the same political party as them. Since following the political beliefs of their parents is a typical occurrence amongst young Americans, this trend of embracing individual’s political beliefs and voting for the opposite political party highlights a growing willingness among young people to question inherited perspectives, forming opinions based on their own values and beliefs. 


As polls remain closely split, this trend could offer Harris’s team an opportunity to connect with swing-state youth by highlighting how every vote can truly make a difference. With so much at stake in these highly contested states, emphasizing how close elections can come down to individual choices may change voter outcomes for this election. The “cancel out” approach adds a competitive yet playful spin, appealing to a younger demographic that may otherwise feel distanced from politics and bringing them into the fold as active participants.


https://nypost.com/2024/10/26/lifestyle/gen-z-vows-to-cancel-out-their-parents-votes-in-new-presidential-election-tiktok-trend/  

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/tiktok-cancel-out-vote-joke-videos-election-rcna177147 

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/10/most-us-parents-pass-along-their-religion-and-politics-to-their-children/ 

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/22/harris-trump-young-voters-cnbc-generation-lab-election.html


Friday, November 1, 2024

Concerns grow as ballot boxes are set on fire in Portland and Vancouver

 With the presidential election coming up soon, tension in the United States is only rising. In the weeks leading up to the election there have been multiple reports of ballot boxes being set on fire. In these ballot boxes, hundreds of ballots were affected, some destroyed completely and others are not legible to read as reported by the Portland Police Bureau.

2 ballot boxes set on fire in Portland and Vancouver - OPB

What was the cause of these fires? An incendiary device placed onto the ballot boxes, in both Portland and Vancouver. The smoke that rose from these devices alerted the public and the police, who ensured the device was deactivated safely and removed by the local bomb squad. Portland Police Bureau spokesperson Mike Benner, says the design of the device reveals an expertise in metalworking and welding, hunting the person behind the crime spent more than minimum effort in devising their plan. Luckily, the ballot box in Portland has already been replaced, 15 miles from the other ballot box that was affected in Vancouver, in Washington’s 3rd Congressional District. The person behind this act was a thirty five year old man, called Dieter B. Klofkorn, who admitted to starting the fires himself. The Phoenix Police Department stated he claimed that he had no political motive in placing these devices, and another source claims he did it in order to be arrested, and the crime was on purpose. Furthermore, it has been ruled that Klorfkorn has been charged with arson.


In response to this crime, the police responded by increasing security around ballot boxes and sending a message: “Make no mistake, an attack on a ballot box is an attack on our democracy and completely unacceptable,” said Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade. Although the attack on the ballot boxes may not have been political, the message it sent reflected the tension the whole country is feeling. The election determines the future of the country, and these moments highlight the overall anxiety of this election. Despite these events, state leaders are still encouraging people to submit their votes, with a new promise of increased security, attempting to reassure fears.


Overall, this event serves as an example of the response to setbacks in the electoral process. It fortunately motivated leaders to reinforce security measures around ballot boxes, reflecting the country’s commitment to the safety of the American people and the democratic process. In increasing security measures, leaders might have also reassured the people’s trust revolving around public safety


Sources:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/28/ballot-box-on-fire-washington-oregon


Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe faces major public backlash after making racist Puerto Rican joke at Trump Rally

 A “floating island of garbage”. These were the words the comedian Tony Hinchcliffe used to describe Puerto Rico. At former president Donald Trump’s rally in Madison Square Garden the comedian attempted to land a joke, however is receiving major backlash due to its racist content.

Who is Tony Hinchcliffe, the comedian who insulted Puerto Rico at Trump's  rally? | AP News It was revealed that Hinchcliffe had rehearsed the material Sunday night, the day prior, at a local comedy club. Not only was this joke rehearsed before its release at the Trump rally, but it was reported that multiple times during his routine Hinchcliffe claimed he would get a better reaction “tomorrow at the rally”. However, by the reaction of the internet, it received far worse backlash. Even more controversial, the comedian's response to the internet was that the joke was “taken out of context to make it seem racist. I love Puerto Rico and vacation there.” This goes to highlight that Hinchcliffe seems to believe he has done nothing wrong and has done nothing to apologize for his words. 

The deputy director of Hispanic communications for the Republican National Committee and Trump campaign said “they don’t have absolute control” over what the speakers were saying. The response to this claim were questions based on the fact that Hinchcliffe read his routine from a teleprompter. Not only does this exemplify the carelessness of Trump’s campaign, but the blatant disrespect for a territory of the United States.

Furthermore, senior advisor Danielle Alvarez reported to NBC News “This joke does not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign”. As for Donald Trump, he has stayed silent so far, showing no personal support or disapproval regarding the joke. However, many celebrities have been vocal in showing their distaste and disapproval regarding Hinchcliffe’s racist joke. Aubrey Plaza, an actress, announces that her abuelita would say “Tony Hinchcliffe, go f— yourself”. Additionally, the Puerto Rican reggaeton star, Bad Bunny, shared a video of Kamala’s Harris and her response to advocate his support of her to his 45 million followers on Instagram. Rafael Collazo, executive director of UndiosUS Action Fund, a Latino advocacy organization reported on Monday morning that Puerto Ricans were volunteering to knock on doors in Philadelphia and Reading with the intent of showing support for Kamala Harris’s campaign. Unfortunately for Hinchcliffe, it appears that his words did more support for the Harris campaign than for Trump.This uproar of support for Puerto Rico is an uplifting reminder that America is a country that is based on unity and equality.



Sources: