Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Instagram Quarantine Trends

                                                                   

                                                                 Image result for instagram

Recently, many trends have been started on Instagram to cope with the social distancing. Instead of going outside to socialize, a lot of people have been staying at home and have been participating in small events that have been flowing throughout social media.

One Instagram trend that started about a week ago was a chain of multiple people drawing a food or an object. Someone would draw a food, for example an orange, and would tag 5 people. Those 5 people would have to draw the same food and tag 5 more people.

Another trend that started very recently was the Until Tomorrow challenge. The Until Tomorrow challenge encourages users to post an embarrassing, funny, or unflattering post on their account for 24 hours. Those who liked the photo were nominated to do the same, and the chain continues.

Many of these trends and challenges have brought people together and seems like it will continue to do so.

1. Did you participate in any of these challenges?

2. Do you think that this is a good method to practice social distancing?

Source 1
Source 2

The Rise of Prices During a Crisis




                                                                       Image result for hand sanitizer coronavirus
 

In the last few weeks many businesses and business people have taken over the market of certain products. Products like hand sanitizer, Clorox wipes, and masks have risen up to 20 times the normal retail price. Many people saw the opportunity to make profit as the demand of these products were high and the supply was very limited, and bought thousands of bottles of hand sanitizers and other products. A bottle of hand sanitizer that would usually cost $5.00 would be marked up to $30.00 and sellers of these products would make thousands of dollars in profit. In the article that I read, a man bought many small bottles of hand sanitizers for a dollar a piece, and sold each of then for $20.00, making a huge amount of profit. On top of the $20.00, Amazon also charges an additional of $10.00 to compensate with the handling and fees. 

In some locations, businesses have taken action so that everyone has an opportunity to buy some hand sanitizer. Stores in Denmark have taken action to limit hoarding by making hand sanitizer progressively more expensive the more bottles of hand sanitizer someone buys. The first bottle would be around $5.00 where as the second bottle would be $143.00.

As the sanitizer scheme progressed, Amazon, eBay, Walmart, and other online commerce websites have attempted to suspend the amount of profit these sellers are making by limiting the price in which they can list at. However, many sellers saw this as only an obstacle and continued to sell their products locally instead of online. 

Although many sellers are probably enjoying their heyday, many businesses including hospitals are struggling to maintain a sanitary environment. With other people hoarding thousands of bottles of hand sanitizers and masks, hospitals have begun to run out of supplies, and have taken action by rationing.


1. Does high demand for items like hand sanitizer and masks during a public health crisis justify higher prices?

2. Is it immoral for those to stockpile on supplies that are necessary for everyone?

3. What precautions would you have taken to limit the amount of hoarding?


Monday, March 23, 2020

WHO do you believe? The Coronavirus Infodemic

[Cross-posted from wideworldstudies. blogspot.com, a new CWS blog for our Coronahiatus]


This Buzzfeed article documents an absurd amount of misinformation being spread across the internet as it relates to Coronavirus, and this is just a partial list. Not only have certain government sources turned out to be unreliable -- like China lying about whether the virus spread from person to person on January 14, or Trump lying about the availability of testing in the USA, or calling it a Democratic hoax -- but the internet has become infested with conspiracy theories, phony treatments, and racist paranoia. 


Here are some excerpts from a terrific analysis on the global war on truth from a Canadian newspaper:


In an alarming number of countries, the surge of coronavirus-related misinformation has been used as a pretext to crack down on information-sharing more broadly. In China, the government’s attempt to suppress information about the outbreak may have actually contributed to the spread of the virus, since no one — including healthcare workers — knew how to protect themselves or even that they should be protecting themselves at all…

Similar arrests for spreading “rumours” and “fake news” have been documented in nearly a dozen countries across Asia and the Middle East…

In Thailand, multiple people have been charged with computer crimes for allegedly sharing false information about coronavirus on social media. Similar arrests have been made in Indonesia, where at least two individuals are facing cybercrime charges that could land them in prison for up to five years. 

Just this week, Indonesian authorities arrested six more people for violating laws that prohibit the sharing of “fake news” and carry a prison sentence of up to six years.

“It’s absurd, and wholly disproportionate, that people are facing a potential five-year jail term just for sharing false information online,” said Teddy Baguilat, a former congressman from the Philippines who is now a board member of the advocacy group ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR).

“And think about the chilling impact such measures have on freedom of expression,” Baguilat added. “Keep this up, and people will be too scared to share their opinion about anything.”

Yet as the virus has spread to new countries, so, too, has the crackdown on so-called “fake news.” In Iran, officials have arrested at least two dozen people on suspicions of “spreading rumours” about the virus, and a government spokesperson recently warned that anyone else found to be sharing false information would be sentenced to one-to-three years in prison and flogging…

Besides the potential for abuse, laws that impose criminal penalties for spreading rumours may also scare people into silence and make experts think twice before sharing information.

“Criminalization of speech, even if targeted at falsehoods, is highly likely to stifle the real-time sharing of information that is essential during epidemics,” Matthew Bugher, head of Asia Programme for the advocacy group Article 19, told Reuters in February.

That’s what happened after Chinese authorities detained Li and seven other doctors in early January, said Dr. Wang Guangbao, a surgeon and science writer from eastern China. He told The Washington Post many medical professionals, including himself, stopped speaking openly about the virus after seeing the potential consequences.
 
The COVID-19 outbreak and response has been accompanied by a massive ‘infodemic’ — an over-abundance of information, some accurate and some not — that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it,” Dr. Margaret Harris, a leading WHO physician, told National Observer. 
The course theme about the changing nature of media fits this story. It is much easier to spread misinformation now in the internet era than in the radio/TV era, but it is still better to err on the side of free speech and not allow government censors decide what is true or not. As frustrating as it is, the least bad way to deal with the infodemic is to learn how to spot reliable information and sources for yourself. There's a never ending tsunami of information, so you students really really need to learn how to swim through it all. Media literacy has become the paramount goal for teaching social studies and history over the past 20 years since the internet became the dominant medium of information for humanity. The coronavirus story has bad information coming from certain government sources and bad information coming from randoms who create it and masses of people who mindlessly share it, and is the perfect example for why you have to learn to be critical readers of media.

Discussion prompts: 


Sunday, March 22, 2020

The Emergence of Remote Learning


Image result for remote learning



Recently, many schools across the world have been canceled due to the coronavirus outbreak. To deal with the absence of school, many schools have attempted to use remote learning as a substitute of classroom learning. Programs such as Zoom, Remind, Screencastify, and Google Classroom have made an appearance and are used to help with remote learning. Many schools have prepared for the changes by giving out devices for those who do not have electronics at home and teachers were given lessons on remote learning. 

However, many problems have arisen as remote learning replaced classroom learning. One problem that was discussed a lot was how remote learning requires concentration and discipline. Without any discipline, many students would not be as motivated to do their work comparing to doing their work while in the classroom. Many students already procrastinate a lot while doing their homework so adding on classwork to procrastinate on as well would not help the situation. 

Another problem that has been brought up is how not every school is financially stable, and a lot of schools would not be able to supply devices to some of their students. Not every student would have access to a device and this would be problematic towards students trying to learn.

Also students with special needs would be extremely difficult to teach remotely, and there would be too many social distractions if taught digitally. Many students with special needs require attention and up front interaction in order to learn, but remote learning hinders the teacher's ability to do so.

Personally, I believe remote learning isn't the most effective way of teaching, but is the best solution to the current situation. Remote learning has many problems surrounding it and there aren't many ways to solve the problem. Classroom learning is far more efficient and effective, and challenges students head on rather than remotely. As the year moves on I hope that we can return to school instead of continuing to learn remotely. Personally, I'm worried about my AP classes and the tests that are coming later this year. Without learning in class, reviewing for the AP test will be a struggle and concerning for some people (including myself).

1. How do you feel about remote learning, and how has it impacted your learning?
2. Do you think remote learning can be administered better? If so how can it be improved?

Source 1
Source 2 
Source 3 

Saturday, March 21, 2020

How to Help one another during the Coronavirus Pandemic


Image result for grocery stores coronavirus


As you all know, schools and jobs worldwide have been canceled and stopped in order to limit the spread of the coronavirus. A lot of workplaces that gather many people in one area have closed, and school districts like ours have also partook by canceling school.


As we are part of a community that is dealing with this crisis, we should also partake in resolving this issue. One way we can help is by practicing solidarity. Solidarity is the interdependence between individuals and across groups. This decreases the spread of the virus as well as keeping each other healthy. It "keeps us from hoarding medicine, toughing out a cold in the workplace or sending a sick child to school." Instead of hoarding 10 packages of toilet paper, consider about the other people around you who need toilet paper as well. Not to surprise anyone but having over 200 rolls of toilet paper will definitely last over a year, and purchasing an excessive amount is not necessary.


Additionally, we the lower-risk group can help our the higher-risk groups like the elderly survive through this pandemic. Instead of having them go out to buy their food and medicine, we should go and buy their supplies for them, reducing the risk of them contracting the virus. If you have any grandparents or elderly nearby, give them a helping hand and buy them their essentials. 


Personally, I have prepared for this crisis by stocking up on food as well as medication for my father. Even though I detest the quarantine, I have been staying home and have been struggling to keep myself entertained. 


1. What have you done to prepare for the coronavirus outbreak?

2. How has the coronavirus affected you and your family's lifestyle? Has anything changed?

Source 1

Sunday, March 15, 2020

The Struggle of Procrastination



For my fourth post, I figured that I would write about something familiar, procrastination. This is something that many people deal with, especially as students. The article I linked down below is from the New York Times, and it describes how procrastination doesn’t necessarily mean an individual is lazy, rather it is about avoiding the response or judgment we fear in regards to our completed work. The article describes two different writers and their struggle with procrastination (one of the writers is Douglas Adams who wrote The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy for which our blog is named). 

People procrastinate for a couple of reasons, it could be a fear of judgment from others, or that we put too much pressure on ourselves to achieve. The recommendations in the article suggest that people choose productive work times, work with other productive individuals, and understand that others are supporting us. I personally procrastinate quite a bit, especially with school projects or assignments that I know will be graded or are worth a lot of points. Whenever the stakes are higher, I tend to procrastinate more, which is a habit I hope to improve on.

1. Do you procrastinate?

2. Do you agree with the article, or do you believe that sometimes we procrastinate because we are just lazy?

Source 1

Friday, March 13, 2020

College Campuses are Closing Down



As many of you are aware, the outbreak of coronavirus is affecting people all over the world. Over the course of this week, schools in the Bay Area and around the country have been shutting down in an effort to prevent the spread of the virus. Since early this week, colleges have gone from switching to online courses to kicking students out of dorms and other campus facilities. According to a New York Times article (found here), one student compared the situation to being evicted. This brings up many issues, as many college students rely on financial aid and may not be able to afford to travel home, leaving them with nowhere to go.  

Though different schools are taking different measures to deal with the current issues, there is a general consensus that all universities will do their best to help support their students. For example, Harvard University is helping many students pay for travel costs to return home, depending on students’ financial status. Other schools are keeping portions of their campus open in order to accommodate those unable to travel. However, there is still the question of students’ tuitions, as they pay thousands of dollars a year to not only attend classes but to also live on campus.

I think the issue of tuition is a significant one, as students are not only losing their housing but also online classes are not as effective as live ones. It is very unlikely that dance or biotech majors are going to have all their needs met through online courses. And, many college students pay for meal plans and various amenities (including gyms and pools) which they are unable to use now that the virus has forced them off-campus. 

I personally believe that students should receive some sort of compensation, whether this is in the form of cheaper tuition the next year or a refund for their housing payments. Unfortunately, this is not very realistic for most colleges, as much of the tuition received is spent and it would be extremely costly to repay all the students while still paying the professors. Not to mention, the universities are also being economically affected by the virus, as many institutions rely on donors and tax dollars for funding, and with the economy declining, universities are concerned about their financial support in the future.  

Ultimately, schools are doing what they believe is best for the health of the student body and faculty. 

  1. How do you think colleges should respond/repay students that are being moved off campus and switched over to online classes? Should they receive refunds for their dorm/housing payments?
  2. On a smaller scale, what is your opinion about Aragon closing classes?



Thursday, March 12, 2020

Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to 23 Years in Prison


On Wednesday, March 11, Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in prison. As many of you probably know, Weinstein was an accomplished movie producer who began to lose his status in 2017 when multiple women came forward and accused him of sexual assault and rape. This somewhat led to the beginning of the Time’s Up movement (connected to the #MeToo movement), as many more individuals were inspired to come forward and report incidents that occurred while working in the film industry and other business settings. 

Over the course of the five-week trial in New York, multiple women testified against him, including Miriam Haley and Jessica Mann. Weinstein was ultimately found guilty of a felony sexual attack and third-degree rape. His sentence of 23 years means that Weinstein, who is 67 and in questionable health, will most likely die in prison if the sentence remains. His defense lawyers argued that 23 years is equivalent to a life sentence in Weinstein’s case, and hope to reduce his sentence or make an appeal. 

Overall the trial was an extremely emotional one. During Haley and Mann’s testimonies, some jurors were seen with tears in their eyes as the women recounted the terrible things that happened to them. Weinstein did not testify in court himself, although when given time to speak, he never apologized. Instead, he mentioned feeling remorseful and compared his situation to that of the Red Scare, when Hollywood celebrities were blacklisted. I think this is an odd comparison, as what Weinstein did was extremely illegal and terrible, and many women have come forward, further confirming Weinstein’s awful actions. However, throughout the trial, Weinstein stood by his claim that the incidents with the women were all consensual, although evidence and testimony proved otherwise.

I agree with the court’s ruling, I believe that Weinstein should pay for the crimes he committed. Miriam Haley described in her testimony the struggles she faced following her encounter with Weinstein, and it is clear that his actions destroyed parts of her life, parts that she is still trying to recover from to this day. Not to mention, the numerous women attacked by Weinstein deserve justice for what he did to them.

  1. Do you agree with Weinstein’s sentence?
  2. How do you think Weinstein’s conviction will further the #MeToo/time’s Up movements? 


Tuesday, March 10, 2020

So What Should Be Done About The Astros?

Image result for dodgers losing to astros
Clayton Kershaw After giving up a Home Run in game 5 of the 2017 World Series


So What Should Be Done?
By Ethan Kelly

So I ask a simple question today…what should we do about the Houston Astros?
  For those of you who don’t know, they cheated at baseball.
And not just a little bit; they cheated themselves right into the World Series.

First of all, I must confess that I feel like I have a personal stake in this conundrum
because I spent my first sixteen years in Southern California and my heart roots for
the Dodgers, and it is my team that was directly affected in the 2017 World Series by
the Astros cheating to win their home games. I realize that it is a far-fetched notion that
the results of the 2017 World Series be either overturned or played over so I will dispense
with that frivolous dream.  Instead, I will focus on the actual players who were involved in
the Houston Astros cheating scandal. And for the record, the vast majority of the players
from the 2017 season are still on the Astros roster.

Cheating in baseball in not an isolated incident, and since Major League Baseball in one form
or another has been ongoing even before California became a state, 1850, there are plenty
of examples of baseball scandals to choose from.  Many involve members of the team that
were not actual players – managers, owners, former players, etc. – and it is my intention to
steer away in this blog from people who were not actually playing the game. It is my
contention that Major League Baseball has chosen to allow the players of the Houston
Astros to get away with it.  Let’s look at the facts. In 2016, the Houston Astros’ batters had
one of baseball’s worst strikeout to walk or hit ratio in baseball. As a result, the team finished
in third place in the American League West Division. As the 2017 season rolled around,
players and some coaches on the team, realizing that the team’s abysmal strikeout penchant
would keep them close to mediocrity once again, decided to do something about it.
  Several methods were employed, including stealing signs from the opposing catcher and
relaying them to the batter, and I must say that this method has been utilized by teams since
baseball began.The difference is that the Astros took their desire to cheat – and thus cutting
down the batters’ striking out so often – to a whole new and illegal level.  After all, baseball
has been aware of sign stealing forever and has instituted a few rules to combat it.
Nonetheless, the Astros decided that they needed the help, and since they were all very
good players, even a couple of stars of the game mixed in, no one would be the wiser.
https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/astros-sign-stealing-scandal-what-to-know-about-mlbs-penalties-against-houston/

What the Astros did not know is that they would eventually be caught, which they were,
and that players, coaches and other ancillary staff many times pick up and move to other teams.
  And let’s face it…it is either too difficult to keep one’s mouth shut or too tempting to institute the
same cheating methods when with one’s new team. And this is exactly what happened.
In the end, when Major League Baseball discovered what the Astros had done during the
2017-2018 season, they reacted quickly and publicly.  However, in my opinion, after deciding
to punish the manager and the coaches from the team by suspending them from baseball for
one year in most cases, they decided to allow the players to receive a public rebuke and literally
nothing else.

Now I must admit that the Major League Players’ Association is one of the strongest unions that
exists in our country and for them, it’s all about protection of their players.  And while I understand
that, I also recognize that this scandal goes well beyond your standard run-of-the-mill transgression.
As previously stated, the team made it all the way to the World Series in 2017, and if we count
in the seven games of the World Series, the dozen or so playoff games to get there and the
teams that the Astros played along the way to get to post-season, we are talking about a
tremendous amount of games and a bunch of teams that got cheated out of their chance at
the post-season.

So let’s look at other player-involved scandals where Baseball stepped in and made not just loud
statements, but suspended or outright banned the players involved.  And I include these examples
particularly because it is my feeling that the punishment of the Astros players – or lack thereof
– is woefully absent from this story and that if I were the Commissioner of Baseball, I would have
come down much harder on the players involved.  And as you can see, plenty of people agree with me.

Let’s go with the most famous cheating scandal first; not just because it is the easiest to cite,
but because it is something that is most analogous to the 2017-2018 Houston Astros, cheating. 
Or more precisely, throwing games. This was the 1919 Chicago Black Sox scandal. 

Now of course the team was called the White Sox, but in 1919 the Chicago White Sox
did something unusual for that team, they went to the World Series to play the Cincinnati Reds.
  Of note is that unlike every other World Series of its time or since, Major League Baseball
decided to go that year with a best of nine format. It was felt that the game of baseball was
not as popular as it would become in subsequent years when teams like the Yankees, Cardinals
and Red Sox rose to prominence. In a nutshell, a powerful gambling syndicate approached several
players, among them the big star of the day Shoeless Joe Jackson, and offered to pay them a
staggering amount of money for the day, and numerous players took the bribe and deliberately
played so poorly that Cincinnati prevailed.  The story has its twists and turns, but the bottom line
in this case is that once you cheat, it will follow you around and won’t let go until you wind up paying
for it in the end. The “Black Sox” scandal was no different than many others. The players denied it,
the owner shrugged it off and the general public had essentially moved on, but the rumors kept flying.
And by the 1920 season, law enforcement got involved and a Grand Jury was formed.
Although the players implicated were acquitted, the newly appointed Commissioner of Major
League Baseball, Judge Kennesaw Mountain Landis, would not sit by silently and permanently
banned all eight players who had been fingered in the cheating probe.


The Pittsburgh Pirates 1985 drug trials is another interesting case where players were involved in
violating Major League Baseball’s rules and were suspended from the game.  Drug use in our society
in general in the mid ‘80s was rampant, and the dangerous practice of drug use had infested baseball,
as well. Cocaine and methamphetamines were the culprits, and players were known to use it before
games, after games and even during games, and many players were actually providing it to their
teammates. Because drug usage in the United States at that time was illegal and transcended the
game, it became a criminal probe, and law enforcement and a Grand Jury became involved, and the
result was numerous trials of over a dozen players and it was the big baseball scandal of the day. 
As a result, Baseball Commissioner Peter Ueberroth instituted suspensions to eleven players, and
although the suspensions were eventually reduced to fines and/or community service, these violations
of baseball’s rules were not ignored or overlooked.
And finally, I will speak of what is simply known as the 1876 Game Throwing Incident. 
This involves a scarcely known team named the Louisville Grays, a team which folded soon
after this long forgotten incident. It seems gambling and the promise of a big payoff can overwhelm
a player who in the 1870s was not making even close to the professional sports salaries of today. 
And once again, major sports gambling approached vulnerable players and offered to pay them sums
far beyond what they were earning to simply play a sub par game, and some did. In the end, as word
got out that players on the Grays had done their very best to make certain that their team would lose
enough games – at one point thirteen in a row – to remove them from post-season contention,
Major League Baseball took action.  Four players were banned from baseball, and although it was felt
at the time that the ban would not last, these four were never reinstated. One star pitcher at the time,
with one of the very best earned run averages in baseball, and with no further prospects to play baseball
at the highest level, decided to join the Philadelphia Police Department.


Three stark examples of cheating in baseball where the baseball community itself took steps to punish
the players involved and allow them to serve as an example to players and teams everywhere that cheating
to affect the outcome or image of the game will not be tolerated.  In some cases, players served their suspension
or punishment and returned to the game, and of course in the most severe and outright suspensions, players
left the game they loved in disgrace and were never to be heard from again.



In the final analysis, although the game of baseball has been tarnished and numerous coaches have been
both suspended and fired from at least three teams directly related to the Astros’ 2017-2018 cheating scandal,
it is my opinion that that is not enough.  As has been stated previously, the players come away from this debacle
completely unscathed and unpunished, and that seems very inadequate to me. I of course wish nothing bad to
happen to the current players on the Houston Astros team. Players around the two leagues have been
forewarned that throwing at Astros players or harming them in any way will be looked upon very unfavorably,
and that is all well and good.  But Major League Baseball should take the bull by the horns and handle this
issue themselves. Like every other team that has been tainted by scandal, the public and the players alike
were allowed to witness firsthand what happens when one cheats, and just as in real life, seeing your fellow
man called to question or taken to task for violating the very rules that they must live by is the greatest example
of how not to violate the rules themselves.  And in my humble opinion, that will be the best way for baseball to
retain its image as America’s greatest pastime

END NOTE: I don understand this is very long, I seemed to be able to write about this very easily, I am sorry.
I also tried to fix the structure of my essay in blogger and change randomly different font sizes so many times
and it would not update correctly after multiple attempts. Again sorry for this inconvenience.

Sources:

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/28507148/survey-fans-want-astros-players-punished-sign-stealing-scandal


https://www.history.com/news/the-black-sox-baseball-scandal-95-years-ago.


1877 Louisville Grays scandal